Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30879235›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Constructed wetland microcosms as sustainable technology for domestic wastewater treatment: an overview.

Saroj Kumar, Venkatesh Dutta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhancing denitrification in constructed wetland with algae addition.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of different bypass rates and unit area ratio in hybrid constructed wetlands.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saroj KumarDepartment of Environmental Science (DES), School of Environmental Science (SES), Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar (A Central) University, Lucknow, UP, 226025, India.
Venkatesh DuttaDepartment of Environmental Science (DES), School of Environmental Science (SES), Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar (A Central) University, Lucknow, UP, 226025, India. dvenks@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-7432

Funding

University Grants Commission 3525/SC/NET-JULY 2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constructed wetland microcosms (CWMs) are artificially designed ecosystem which utilizes both complex and ordinary interactions between supporting media, macrophytes, and microorganisms to treat almost all types of wastewater. CWMs are considered as green and sustainable techniques which require lower energy input, less operational and maintenance cost and provide critical ecological benefits such as wildlife habitat, aquaculture, groundwater recharge, flood control, recreational uses, and add aesthetic value. They are good alternatives to conventional treatment systems particularly for smaller communities as well as distant and decentralized locations. The pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), and temperature are the key controlling factors while several other parameters such as hydraulic loading rates (HLR), hydraulic retention time (HRT), diversity of macrophytes, supporting media, and water depth are critical to achieving better performance. From the literature survey, it is evaluated that the removal performance of CWMs can be improved significantly through recirculation of effluent and artificial aeration (intermittent). This review paper presents an assessment of CWMs as a sustainable option for treatment of wastewater nutrients, organics, and heavy metals from domestic wastewater. Initially, a concise note on the CWMs and their components are presented, followed by a description of treatment mechanisms, major constituents involved in the treatment process, and overall efficiency. Finally, the effects of ecological factors and challenges for their long-term operations are highlighted.

Indexed as

WetlandsEcologyEcosystemOxygenTemperatureWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterOxygenWastewaterConstructed wetland microcosmsDomestic wastewaterHeavy metalsMacrophytesNutrientsSustainability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.