Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30879231›Full record

SynthesisMusculoskeletal surgery2020

Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

A Zanirato, M Formica, L Cavagnaro, S Divano, G Burastero, L Felli

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are similar in improving short- and mid-term outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cones and sleeves present good survival and clinical outcome in revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Applications of 3D printing in orthopedics: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Utilizing 3d-printed patient-specific porous titanium cones in complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Management of Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A ZaniratoClinica Ortopedica - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy. dott.zanirato@gmail.com.
M FormicaClinica Ortopedica - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy.
L CavagnaroOrtopedia e Traumatologia 2 - Joint Replacement Unit - Ospedale Santa Corona, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy.
S DivanoClinica Ortopedica - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy.
G BurasteroOrtopedia e Traumatologia 2 - Joint Replacement Unit - Ospedale Santa Corona, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy.
L FelliClinica Ortopedica - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITOspedale Santa Corona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is increasing of relevance in orthopaedic surgeon daily practice and this trend is likely to continue in the years ahead. The aim of this systematic review of English literature is to summarize and compare indications, complications, clinical and radiological results of metaphyseal cones and sleeves in management of bone loss in rTKA. Retrospective or prospective studies with at least 1 year of follow-up (FU) were included. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. Clinical and radiological results, rates of intraoperative fractures, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic joint infection, septic failure, reoperations and re-revisions were extrapolated by the papers. Thirty-seven articles were included in the systematic review. Results of 927 cones (mean FU of 3.6 ± 1.4 years) and 1801 sleeves (mean FU of 4.5 ± 1.6 years) were analysed. The studies showed good clinical and functional outcomes. Cones and sleeves allowed a stable metaphyseal fixation. The aseptic survivorship of the implants was 97.3% in cones group and 97.8% in sleeves group. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves represent a viable option in management of type IIb and III AORI bone defects in aseptic and septic TKAr with overlapping survival rate. Further high-quality long-term studies would better clarify complications, clinical and radiological results of these promising techniques in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignReoperationHumansProspective StudiesRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBone defectComplicationsMetaphyseal conesMetaphyseal sleevesResultsRevision total knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID30879231
OpenAlexW2921488317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.