Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30879217›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

The development of a role description and competency map for pharmacists in an interprofessional care setting.

Helen Benson, Cherie Lucas, Shalom I Benrimoj, Kylie A Williams

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pharmacists in general practice: what do they do? A qualitative case study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  10. GPs' and pharmacists' views of integrating pharmacists into general practices: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helen BensonGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Level 4, Building 7, 67 Thomas St, Ultimo, P.O. Box 123, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia. helen.benson@uts.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6918-5045
Cherie LucasGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Level 4, Building 7, 67 Thomas St, Ultimo, P.O. Box 123, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Shalom I BenrimojSydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney Australia, Pharmacy and Bank Building (A15), Science Road, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Kylie A WilliamsGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Level 4, Building 7, 67 Thomas St, Ultimo, P.O. Box 123, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Funding

Western Sydney Primary Health Network Project ID PRO 17-4279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Pharmacists are increasingly being included as members of general practice primary care teams. To date, there have been few published studies describing the competencies of general practice (GP) pharmacists and establishing their subsequent educational needs. Aim of the review The aim of this literature review is to establish the activities of pharmacists in general practice to inform the development of a comprehensive role description and competency map. Method A systematic literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, international pharmaceutical abstracts and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews was conducted from the start of the databases to August 2018. The search focused on studies investigating the roles performed by GP pharmacists. Full text peer-reviewed English language articles were included. A qualitative content analysis of included studies was performed. Two researchers reviewed studies to identify pharmacist roles. Subcategories of roles were then agreed by the research team and used to present the data. GP pharmacist's activities were mapped by two researchers to associated competencies. Any discrepancies between role descriptions and competency maps were resolved in consultation with a third member of the research team. Results The search conducted resulted in 5370 potential articles. Two hundred and twenty-seven full text articles were selected for review resulting in 34 articles that were included for analysis. Seven GP pharmacist role sub-categories and 48 GP pharmacist individual roles were identified. The seven GP pharmacist role sub-categories included medication management, patient examination and screening, chronic disease management, drug information and education, collaboration and liaison, audit and quality assurance and research. All FIP competency domains were included in the GP pharmacist competency map. Competencies related to compounding, dispensing and packaging of medications were not found relevant to the GP Pharmacist role. No roles were mapped to competencies relating to re-imbursement for medicines, procurement, or medication production. All areas of professional and personal competence were relevant to the GP pharmacist role. Conclusion A comprehensive role description and competency map for GP pharmacists is described and may be used to inform future research into the education of GP pharmacists.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceNeeds AssessmentProfessional RoleEducation, PharmacyHumansPatient Care TeamPharmacistsAustraliaCollaborative careGeneral practice pharmacistIntegrated careInterprofessional careNon-dispensing pharmacist

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.