ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019
An evaluation of the role of practice pharmacists in Australia: a mixed methods study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Safe Handover or Lost in Transition?-A Retrospective Evaluation of Pharmacist Referrals to Primary Care Following Hospital Discharge.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Underused Competence: Clinical Pharmacists' Experiences of Writing Referrals in Transitions of Care.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The potential for clinical pharmacists to support older people with dementia in the community: A qualitative interview study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- Pharmacy stakeholders' views and experiences of the credentialing of advanced or specialist pharmacist practice: A mixed methods systematic review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- An exploration of Northern Ireland general practice pharmacists' views on their role in general practice: a cross-sectional survey.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- The Pharmacy of the Future: Pharmacy Professionals' Perceptions and Contributions Regarding New Services in Community Pharmacies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluating the potential outcomes of pharmacist-led activities in the Australian general practice setting: a prospective observational study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Observational
- GPs' and pharmacists' views of integrating pharmacists into general practices: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Article
- Integration of pharmacist independent prescribers into general practice: a mixed-methods study of pharmacists' and patients' views.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2023Article
- Models of care and the role of clinical pharmacists in UK primary care for older adults: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2023Article
- Patient perceptions and experiences of medication review: qualitative study in general practice.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- General practitioners' views of pharmacist services in general practice: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Family practice · 2022Article
- A pharmacist-led intervention to improve the management of opioids in a general practice: a qualitative evaluation of participant interviews.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022Article
- Evaluating the role and integration of general practice pharmacists in England: a cross-sectional study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Perspectives of community pharmacists in Pakistan about practice change and implementation of extended pharmacy services: a mixed method study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Patients' experiences of pharmacists in general practice: an exploratory qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Community pharmacy teams' experiences of general practice-based pharmacists: an exploratory qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The need for greater collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners in Australia facilitated the development of the practice pharmacist role. Practice pharmacists work from within general practices to provide services to patients and health professionals to improve the quality use of medications. Objective To explore the perceptions of Australian accredited pharmacists and pharmacists already working in general practices about current roles, facilitators and barriers, and remuneration expectations of practice pharmacists. Setting This study was conducted Australia wide. Method This was a two-stage study. The first stage involved a quantitative online questionnaire of accredited pharmacists whilst the second stage involved semistructured interviews with pharmacists working in general practice. Main outcome measure Pharmacists' opinions on expected and current roles, barriers and facilitators, remuneration expectations and training requirements for practice pharmacist. Results A total of 65 accredited pharmacists completed the online survey and 20 practice pharmacists participated in interviews. The primary practice pharmacist roles identified included medication reviews, verifying the appropriateness of prescriptions, counselling and promoting adherence and providing education to other allied health professionals in the practice. The major facilitator identified was enhanced communication. Remuneration expectations and current working relationships were identified as main barriers. Conclusion The implementation of an appropriate funding model and a defined scope of role are critical to the successful implementation of the role of practice pharmacists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30879214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.