Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30879186›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2019

Combined effects of very short "all out" efforts during sprint and resistance training on physical and physiological adaptations after 2 weeks of training.

Stefano Benítez-Flores, André R Medeiros, Fabrício Azevedo Voltarelli, Eliseo Iglesias-Soler, Kenji Doma, Herbert G Simões, Thiago Santos Rosa, Daniel A Boullosa

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Acute and Delayed Effects of Time-Matched Very Short "All Out" Efforts in Concentric vs. Eccentric Cycling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefano Benítez-FloresPost-Graduation Program in Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
André R MedeirosPost-Graduation Program in Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2097-4112
Fabrício Azevedo VoltarelliPost-graduation Program in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil.
Eliseo Iglesias-SolerDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of A Coruna, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-4188
Kenji DomaSport and Exercise Science, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Herbert G SimõesPost-Graduation Program in Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
Thiago Santos RosaPost-Graduation Program in Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
Daniel A BoullosaSport and Exercise Science, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia. daniel.boullosa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8477-127X

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico PQ1BConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico PQ2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the combined effects of resistance and sprint training, with very short efforts (5 s), on aerobic and anaerobic performances, and cardiometabolic health-related parameters in young healthy adults.

methodsThirty young physically active individuals were randomly allocated into four groups: resistance training (RTG), sprint interval training (SITG), concurrent training (CTG), and control (CONG). Participants trained 3 days/week for 2 weeks in the high-intensity interventions that consisted of 6-12 "all out" efforts of 5 s separated by 24 s of recovery, totalizing ~ 13 min per session, with 48-72 h of recovery between sessions. Body composition, vertical jump, lower body strength, aerobic and anaerobic performances, heart rate variability (HRV), and redox status were evaluated before and after training. Total work (TW), rating of perceived exertion (CR-10 RPE) and mean HR (HR

resultsMaximum oxygen consumption (VO

conclusionsRT and SIT protocols with very short "all out" efforts, either performed in isolation, or combined, demonstrated improvement in several physical fitness- and health-related parameters. However, CT was the most efficient exercise intervention with improvement observed in the majority of the parameters.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalHeart RatePhysical ExertionAdolescentAdultDietFemaleHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalOxygen ConsumptionCardiometabolic healthConcurrent trainingHigh-intensity interval trainingPerformanceSprint interval training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.