Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30879183›Full record

Observational studyEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

Prediction of brace effect in scoliotic patients: blinded evaluation of a novel brace simulator-an observational cross-sectional study.

Aurélien Courvoisier, Matthieu Nesme, Julien Gerbelot, Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry, François Faure

Abstract readObservational StudyVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aurélien CourvoisierGrenoble Alps Scoliosis and Spine Center-Grenoble Alps University Hospital. SPM-TIMC-IMAG, BP 217, Grenoble Cedex 09, France. aurelien.courvoisier@gmail.com.
Matthieu NesmeAnatoscope-Cap-Omega Rond-Point Benjamin Franklin, 34960, Montpellier, France.
Julien GerbelotDemeure Orthopédie, 1 Rue Rosa Lee Parks, 38400, Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France.
Alexandre Moreau-GaudryCIC-IT, TIMC-IMAG, 5 Avenue Du Grand Sablon, 38700, La Tronche, France.
François FaureAnatoscope-Cap-Omega Rond-Point Benjamin Franklin, 34960, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBracing is the most commonly used treatment for scoliosis. But braces remain predominantly "handcrafted." Our objective was to create a novel brace simulator using a high-fidelity 3D "avatar" of the patient's trunk.

methodsAn observational cross-sectional study was constructed. The inclusion criteria were patients with a moderate idiopathic scoliosis (between 15° and 35° of Cobb angle) aged between 9 and 15 years old with an indication of brace treatment. Twenty-nine scoliotic patients, 25 girls and four boys, with a mean age of 12.4 years were included. Twenty right thoracic and 14 left lumbar were measured with a mean Cobb angle of 24°. 3D "avatars" were generated using a novel technology called the "anatomy transfer." Biomedical simulations were conducted by engineers who were blinded to the clinical effect of the real patient brace. The in-brace Cobb angle effect (real effect) was compared with the virtual numeric in-brace Cobb angle observed using the blindly constructed avatar (simulation effect).

resultsReal and simulated in-brace Cobb angle were compared using a paired two-sided Student's t test. The real mean Cobb angle was 11° and 17° in the simulation which was statistically significant. The strength of prediction of the simulation was assessed for each individual patient; 76% of the real in-brace Cobb angles had good and moderate prediction (± 10°).

conclusionsIncorporating high-fidelity copy of the entire 3D shape of the patient's trunk and multiple 3D-reconstructed bony images into an anatomical reference avatar resulted in moderate-to-good prediction of brace effect in three quarters of patients. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

BracesModels, AnatomicAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLumbar VertebraeMalePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRadiographyScoliosisSingle-Blind MethodThoracic VertebraeAvatarBraceBrace simulatorPatient specificScoliosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.