Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30879133›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2019

The effects of different sampling techniques on peripheral post mortem tryptase levels: a recommended sampling method.

J Garland, W Philcox, S McCarthy, S Hensby-Bennet, B Ondruschka, L Woydt, U Da Broi, C Palmiere, L Lam, Y Ahn and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anaphylactic Death: A New Forensic Workflow for Diagnosis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

J GarlandForensic & Analytical Science Service, NSW Health Pathology, New South Wales, Australia.
W PhilcoxFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
S McCarthyDepartment of Forensic Pathology, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, 1148, New Zealand.
S Hensby-BennetWaikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.
B OndruschkaInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
L WoydtInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
U Da BroiDepartment of Medicine, Section of Forensic Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
C PalmiereCURML, University Center of Legal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
L LamDepartment of Biochemistry, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Y AhnDepartment of Immunopathology, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
K KeshaDepartment of Forensic Pathology, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, 1148, New Zealand.
S StablesDepartment of Forensic Pathology, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, 1148, New Zealand.
R TseDepartment of Forensic Pathology, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, 1148, New Zealand. rexson.tse@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1388-9537
Auckland City Hospital · NZLeipzig University · DEUniversity of Auckland · NZNew South Wales Department of Health · AUUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine · CHUniversity of Udine · ITWaikato District Health Board · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different sampling techniques can impact on post mortem tryptase levels. A previous study demonstrated significantly lower femoral post mortem total tryptase levels in samples collected via transcutaneous aspiration compared with directly sampling during internal examination. However, an outlier with high tryptase level was noted in one transcutaneous aspiration sample. This 6-month prospective study compared total post mortem tryptase levels between 21 paired aspirated venous and arterial femoral blood samples, and 19 paired aspirated and cutdown femoral venous blood samples in non-anaphylactic deaths only. No statistical differences were demonstrated between the different sampling methods. However, four outlier cases with higher tryptase levels in aspirated arterial and femoral cutdown samples compared with aspirated venous femoral samples were noted. The reasons for the outliers may be due to the bloods collected from these two methods being contaminated by central arterial and venous blood with high tryptase levels respectively. None of the aspirated venous femoral post mortem tryptase levels were above recognized post mortem tryptase cutoff to diagnose anaphylaxis. This study recommends aspirating blood samples from a clamped femoral/external iliac vein for post mortem tryptase analysis should be defined as the gold standard. Further study using the recommended sampling method on post mortem tryptase levels in non-anaphylactic and anaphylactic cases is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyBlood Specimen CollectionConstrictionFemaleFemoral ArteryFemoral VeinForensic PathologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTryptasesYoung AdultTryptasesAnaphylaxisArterialAspirateCutdownPost mortemSamplingTryptaseVenous

Identifiers

PMID30879133
OpenAlexW2922120257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.