Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30879126›Full record

Trial reportChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2019

Comparison of equiosmolar dose of hyperosmolar agents in reducing intracranial pressure-a randomized control study in pediatric traumatic brain injury.

S Arun Kumar, Bhagavatula Indira Devi, Madhusudan Reddy, Dhaval Shukla

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Results of therapy in children diagnosed with severe traumatic brain injury.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Management of severe traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients: an evidence-based approach.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S Arun KumarDepartment of Neurosurgery, NIMHANS, Bangalore, India.
Bhagavatula Indira DeviDepartment of Neurosurgery, NIMHANS, Bangalore, India.
Madhusudan ReddyDepartment of Neuroanesthesia, NIMHANS, Bangalore, India.
Dhaval ShuklaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, 560029, India. neurodhaval@rediffmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7613-1929
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are no comparative studies available for hyperosmolar therapy in children. The present study is a prospective open label randomized control trial to compare the effect of equiosmolar doses of mannitol and hypertonic saline in reducing intracranial pressure in children who sustained severe traumatic brain injury.

methodsThis is a prospective open-label randomized controlled trial. Thirty children aged less than or equal to 16 years with severe traumatic brain injury and raised intracranial pressure as measured by ventricular catheter insertion were enrolled. Sixteen children received 20% mannitol, and 14 children received 3% saline as 2.5 ml/kg bolus for episodes of intracranial pressure above cutoff value for age. The mean reduction in intracranial pressure and Glasgow outcome scale at 6 months after injury was measured.

resultsThe mean reduction in intracranial pressure in mannitol group was 7.13 mmHg and in hypertonic saline group was 5.67 mmHg, and the difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.33. The incidence of death or survival in vegetative state was 23.07% in mannitol group and 16.66% in hypertonic saline group, and the difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.69.

conclusionBoth mannitol and hypertonic saline were equally effective for treatment of raised intracranial pressure in children with severe traumatic brain injury.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrain Injuries, TraumaticChildChild, PreschoolDiuretics, OsmoticFemaleHumansInfantIntracranial HypertensionMaleMannitolProspective StudiesSaline Solution, HypertonicTreatment OutcomeDiuretics, OsmoticMannitolSaline Solution, HypertonicHypertonic salineMannitol

Identifiers

PMID30879126
OpenAlexW2920825243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.