ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2019
Implementation of an intensified outpatient follow-up protocol improves outcomes in patients with ventricular assist devices.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing heart failure treatment following cardiac resynchronization therapy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020Trial
- A novel risk score to predict survival in advanced heart failure due to cardiac amyloidosis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVentricular assist devices (VAD) are increasingly used as long-term treatment for advanced heart failure. However, survival after VAD implantation is still unsatisfactory, and no specific outpatient follow-up algorithms have been formally established. Here, we evaluate the effect of an intensified follow-up protocol (IFUP) on survival rates and VAD-associated complications. METHODS AND
resultsThis is a retrospective study of 57 patients who received a VAD at our center between February 2013 and December 2017. Inclusion criteria were discharge home after VAD implantation and follow-up in our VAD outpatient clinic. Patients implanted after October 2015 (n = 30) were monitored according to IFUP. This protocol embodied formalized, multi-disciplinary clinical visits every 4-8 weeks including a cardiologist, a cardiothoracic surgeon and a VAD-coordinator and was characterized by optimized anticoagulation and wound management as well as guideline-directed medical therapy. One-year survival in the IFUP patients was 97%, compared to 74% in the pre-IFUP era (p = 0.01). Implementation of IFUP was associated with a 90% risk-reduction for 1-year mortality (relative risk 0.099; p = 0.048). The rate of complications, e.g., device thrombosis and major bleeding, was significantly reduced, resulting in superior event-free survival in the IFUP group (p = 0.003). Furthermore, by implementation of IFUP, a more stable anticoagulation adjustment was achieved as well as an improved adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy.
conclusionImplementation of an IFUP for VAD patients is associated with a significant decrease in 1-year all-cause mortality. This emphasizes the need for more vigilance in the management of VAD patients by a dedicated multi-disciplinary team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.