Observational studyJAMA cardiology2019
Misclassification of Myocardial Injury as Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Assessing Outcomes in Value-Based Programs.
Observational study in JAMA cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Utility of biomarkers in patients with a type 2 myocardial infarction: a systematic review.Open heart · 2026Pooled it
- Restrictive Versus Liberal Transfusion in Patients With Type 1 or Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Prespecified Analysis of the MINT Trial.Circulation · 2024Trial
- Validity of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes in diagnosing myocardial infarction subtypes.American heart journal · 2026Article
- The Effect of Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion Strategy on Subsequent Myocardial Infarction Type.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease in Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Improving classification of myocardial infarction with machine learning in a diverse population.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- The assessment and management of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction: an international Delphi study.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Article
- Spectrum From Acute Myocardial Injury to Infarction Among People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Seeking Emergency Care in the United States: Presentations, Provider Responses, and Clinical Outcomes.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Identification of Clinical Phenotypes in Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Insights Into Characteristics, Prognosis, and Management Strategies.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Defining myocardial infarction: grades of severity or different aetiology.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2025Article
- Liraglutide Treatment Restores Cardiac Function After Isoprenaline-Induced Myocardial Injury and Prevents Heart Failure in Rats.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cardiac Troponin Levels in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: "Markers of High Risk or Just Noise''?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Elderly Patients: A Narrative Review through Decisional Crossroads.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Application of the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction in Clinical Practice in Scotland and Sweden.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Quality of care in patients with hypertension: a retrospective cohort study of primary care routine data in Germany.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Classification Algorithm to Distinguish Between Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in Administrative Claims Data.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Article
- COVID-19 and myocardial injury: Targeting elevated biomarkers for potential novel therapies.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Article
- Readmissions for Myocardial Infarction Among Survivors of COVID-19 Hospitalization: Nationwide Analysis From Pandemic Year 2020.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Similar to other patients with acute myocardial infarction, patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) are included in several value-based programs, including the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. To our knowledge, whether nonischemic myocardial injury is being misclassified as T2MI is unknown and may have implications for these programs. Objective: To determine whether patients with nonischemic myocardial injury are being miscoded as having T2MI and if this has implications for 30-day readmission and mortality rates. Design, Settings, and Participants: Using the new International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code, we identified patients who were coded as having T2MI between October 2017 and May 2018 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Strict adjudication using the fourth universal definition of MI was then applied. Main outcome and Measures: Clinical adjudication of T2MI and 30-day readmission and mortality rates as a function of T2MI or nonischemic myocardial injury. Results: Of 633 patients, 369 (58.3%) were men and 514 (81.2%) were white. After strict adjudication, 359 (56.7%) had T2MI, 265 (41.9%) had myocardial injury, 6 (0.9%) had type 1 MI, and 3 (0.5%) had unstable angina. Patients with T2MI had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities than those with myocardial injury. Patients with T2MI and myocardial injury had high in-hospital mortality rates (10.6% and 8.7%, respectively; P = .50). Of those discharged alive (563 [88.9%]), 30-day readmission rates (22.7% vs 21.1%; P = .68) and mortality rates (4.4% vs 7.4%; P = .14) were comparable among patients with T2MI and myocardial injury. Conclusions and Relevance: A substantial percentage of patients coded as having T2MI actually have myocardial injury. Both conditions have high 30-day readmission and mortality rates. Including patients with high-risk myocardial injury may have substantial implications for value-based programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.