Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30879022›Full record

Observational studyJAMA cardiology2019

Misclassification of Myocardial Injury as Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Assessing Outcomes in Value-Based Programs.

Cian McCarthy, Sean Murphy, Joshua A Cohen, Saad Rehman, Maeve Jones-O'Connor, David S Olshan, Avinainder Singh, Muthiah Vaduganathan, James L Januzzi, Jason H Wasfy

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Defining myocardial infarction: grades of severity or different aetiology.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cian McCarthyDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Sean MurphyDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Joshua A CohenDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Saad RehmanDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Maeve Jones-O'ConnorDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
David S OlshanDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Avinainder SinghDepartment of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Muthiah VaduganathanBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
James L JanuzziDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Jason H WasfyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Similar to other patients with acute myocardial infarction, patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) are included in several value-based programs, including the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. To our knowledge, whether nonischemic myocardial injury is being misclassified as T2MI is unknown and may have implications for these programs. Objective: To determine whether patients with nonischemic myocardial injury are being miscoded as having T2MI and if this has implications for 30-day readmission and mortality rates. Design, Settings, and Participants: Using the new International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code, we identified patients who were coded as having T2MI between October 2017 and May 2018 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Strict adjudication using the fourth universal definition of MI was then applied. Main outcome and Measures: Clinical adjudication of T2MI and 30-day readmission and mortality rates as a function of T2MI or nonischemic myocardial injury. Results: Of 633 patients, 369 (58.3%) were men and 514 (81.2%) were white. After strict adjudication, 359 (56.7%) had T2MI, 265 (41.9%) had myocardial injury, 6 (0.9%) had type 1 MI, and 3 (0.5%) had unstable angina. Patients with T2MI had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities than those with myocardial injury. Patients with T2MI and myocardial injury had high in-hospital mortality rates (10.6% and 8.7%, respectively; P = .50). Of those discharged alive (563 [88.9%]), 30-day readmission rates (22.7% vs 21.1%; P = .68) and mortality rates (4.4% vs 7.4%; P = .14) were comparable among patients with T2MI and myocardial injury. Conclusions and Relevance: A substantial percentage of patients coded as having T2MI actually have myocardial injury. Both conditions have high 30-day readmission and mortality rates. Including patients with high-risk myocardial injury may have substantial implications for value-based programs.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overAngina, UnstableCase-Control StudiesComorbidityDiagnostic ErrorsEthnicityFemaleHeart InjuriesHospital MortalityHospitalsHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30879022
PMCPMC6537800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.