Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30878986›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

What are the characteristics and progression of visual field defects in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy: a prospective single-centre study in China.

Hong-Li Liu, Jia-Jia Yuan, Zhen Tian, Xin Li, Lin Song, Bin Li

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01267422 nacompletednot on this map

Safety and Efficacy Study of a Single Intravitreal Injection of rAAV2-ND4 Treatment of Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBin LiRan2011 to 2015Enrolled9ConditionsLeber Hereditary Optic NeuropathyArmsrAAV2-ND4
NCT03428178 naunknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy Study of Gene Therapy for The Treatment of Acute LHON Onset Within Three Months

TypeinterventionalSponsorBin LiRan2018 to 2020Enrolled120ConditionsAcute LHON, Onset Within Three Months, Onset Between 3 to 6 Months, Onset Between 6 to 12 MonthsArmsrAAV2-ND4
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hong-Li LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jia-Jia YuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhen TianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Xin LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Lin SongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Bin LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the characteristics and progression of visual field defects in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy.

designProspective study.

setting3-A-class hospital in China; single-centre study.

participantsFrom 100 patients diagnosed with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, 80 (160 eyes; 68 men and 12 women; youngest patient, 6 years; oldest patient, 35 years) were recruited. EXPOSURE: All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. Each patient underwent at least three visual field examinations. Patient groups 1-6 were created according to the time of visual field data acquisition. Patient group 7 included patients with a different onset of disease between eyes. Group 8 was composed of patients with a course of disease of 12-24 months when one of the examinations performed. Patients who performed the third examination made up patient group 9. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of the different visual field defect types on the basis of severity in groups 1-6. Mean of the difference of visual function between eyes in group 7.

resultIn groups 1-6, the prevalences of defects classified using Visual Field Index values were significantly different between groups 1 and 3. In group 7, with the prolongation of the course of the disease, the mean of the difference of visual function between eyes decreased. There was no significant correlation between age and the severity of visual field defect. There was significant correlation between visual acuity and the severity of visual field defect.

conclusionVisual field defects in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (G11778A) may continuously progress within 6 months of disease development, and remain stable after 9 months. With the progression of the disease, the differences in visual function between eyes may decrease. The severity of visual field defect seems to be independent of age; however, could be related to visual acuity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03428178, NCT01267422.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityVisual FieldsAdolescentAdultChildChinaDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleOptic Atrophy, Hereditary, LeberProspective StudiesVision DisordersVisual Field TestsYoung Adultgenetic therapyleber hereditary optic neuropathyvisual fields

Identifiers

PMID30878986
PMCPMC6429856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.