ArticleEpidemics2019
Efficient vaccination strategies for epidemic control using network information.
Article in Epidemics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulating targeted vaccination strategies with network-based and agent-based models: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Unifying Summary Statistic Selection for Approximate Bayesian Computation.Statistics and computing · 2026Article
- Modeling the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and the efficacy of different vaccines across different network structures.PloS one · 2025Article
- Real-time updating of dynamic social networks for COVID-19 vaccination strategies.Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing · 2023Article
- Modeling the effectiveness of targeting Rift Valley fever virus vaccination using imperfect network information.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Protocol: Mapping social networks, social influence and sexual health among youth in rural KwaZulu-Natal, the Sixhumene cohort study.Wellcome open research · 2022Article
- Network analysis of live pig movements in North Macedonia: Pathways for disease spread.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Prioritizing vaccination based on analysis of community networks.Applied network science · 2022Article
- COVID-19 Vaccination in Developing Nations: Challenges and Opportunities for Innovation.Infectious disease reports · 2021Review
- Animal movement in a pastoralist population in the Maasai Mara Ecosystem in Kenya and implications for pathogen spread and control.Preventive veterinary medicine · 2021Article
- Immunization strategies in networks with missing data.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Network Analysis of Swine Shipments in China: The First Step to Inform Disease Surveillance and Risk Mitigation Strategies.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- Using Social Networks to Understand and Overcome Implementation Barriers in the Global HIV Response.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019Review
- A Network Approach to Stroke Systems of Care.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNetwork-based interventions against epidemic spread are most powerful when the full network structure is known. However, in practice, resource constraints require decisions to be made based on partial network information. We investigated how the accuracy of network data available at individual and village levels affected network-based vaccination effectiveness.
methodsWe simulated a Susceptible-Infected-Recovered process on static empirical social networks from 75 rural Indian villages. First, we used regression analysis to predict the percentage of individuals ever infected (cumulative incidence) based on village-level network properties for simulated datasets from 10 representative villages. Second, we simulated vaccinating 10% of each of the 75 empirical village networks at baseline, selecting vaccinees through one of five network-based approaches: random individuals (Random); random contacts of random individuals (Nomination); random high-degree individuals (High Degree); highest degree individuals (Highest Degree); or most central individuals (Central). The first three approaches require only sample data; the latter two require full network data. We also simulated imposing a limit on how many contacts an individual can nominate (Fixed Choice Design, FCD), which reduces the data collection burden but generates only partially observed networks.
resultsIn regression analysis, we found mean and standard deviation of the degree distribution to strongly predict cumulative incidence. In simulations, the Nomination method reduced cumulative incidence by one-sixth compared to Random vaccination; full network methods reduced infection by two-thirds. The High Degree approach had intermediate effectiveness. Somewhat surprisingly, FCD truncating individuals' degrees at three was as effective as using complete networks.
conclusionsUsing even partial network information to prioritize vaccines at either the village or individual level, i.e. determine the optimal order of communities or individuals within each village, substantially improved epidemic outcomes. Such approaches may be feasible and effective in outbreak settings, and full ascertainment of network structure may not be required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.