ArticleLancet (London, England)2019
The relationships between democratic experience, adult health, and cause-specific mortality in 170 countries between 1980 and 2016: an observational analysis.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Democracy, Culture and Cancer Patients' Willingness to Pay for Healthcare Services: A Meta-analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingPooled it
- Seeing no way out: exploring the connection between internalized caregiver stigma, entrapment, suicidal ideation, and depressive symptoms among Canadian informal caregivers.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026Article
- Against Hierarchy: Organizing Horizontally in Healthcare.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026Article
- Strengthening non-communicable disease health systems through sustainable health partnerships in the Horn of Africa using lessons from the Wolverhampton-Somaliland Global Health Partnership.Discover public health · 2026Review
- The exposome of healthy and accelerated aging across 40 countries.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Democracy Matters for Child Health.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2025Article
- Article
- Gauging public perceptions of military and police roles in US domestic pandemic response during COVID-19.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Informal employment, population health, and welfare policies: A global empirical analysis between 2011-2021.PloS one · 2025Article
- Re-politicizing the WHO's social determinants of health framework.Health promotion international · 2024Article
- Accuracy, potential, and limitations of probabilistic record linkage in identifying deaths by gender identity and sexual orientation in the state of Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.BMC public health · 2024Article
- National plans and awareness campaigns as priorities for achieving global brain health.The Lancet. Global health · 2024Review
- Determinants of government spending on primary healthcare: a global data analysis.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Electoral Democracy and Working-Age Mortality.The Milbank quarterly · 2023Article
- Collective Violence against Health Workers in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
- Introducing Critical Accounting for Governance as a Tool in Exploring the Commercial Determinants of Health.International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- Is Economic Growth Good for Population Health? A Critical Review.Canadian studies in population · 2023Review
- When do democratic transitions reduce or increase child mortality? Exploring the role of non-violent resistance.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022Article
- Female political representation and the gender health gap: a cross-national analysis of 49 European countries.European journal of public health · 2022Article
- Trust made the difference for democracies in COVID-19.Lancet (London, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious analyses of democracy and population health have focused on broad measures, such as life expectancy at birth and child and infant mortality, and have shown some contradictory results. We used a panel of data spanning 170 countries to assess the association between democracy and cause-specific mortality and explore the pathways connecting democratic rule to health gains.
methodsWe extracted cause-specific mortality and HIV-free life expectancy estimates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 and information on regime type from the Varieties of Democracy project. These data cover 170 countries and 46 years. From the Financing Global Health database, we extracted gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, also covering 46 years, and Development Assistance for Health estimates starting from 1990 and domestic health spending estimates starting from 1995. We used a diverse set of empirical methods-synthetic control, within-country variance decomposition, structural equation models, and fixed-effects regression-which together provide a robust analysis of the association between democratisation and population health.
findingsHIV-free life expectancy at age 15 years improved significantly during the study period (1970-2015) in countries after they transitioned to democracy, on average by 3% after 10 years. Democratic experience explains 22·27% of the variance in mortality within a country from cardiovascular diseases, 16·53% for tuberculosis, and 17·78% for transport injuries, and a smaller percentage for other diseases included in the study. For cardiovascular diseases, transport injuries, cancers, cirrhosis, and other non-communicable diseases, democratic experience explains more of the variation in mortality than GDP. Over the past 20 years, the average country's increase in democratic experience had direct and indirect effects on reducing mortality from cardiovascular disease (-9·64%, 95% CI -6·38 to -12·90), other non-communicable diseases (-9·14%, -4·26 to -14·02), and tuberculosis (-8·93%, -2·08 to -15·77). Increases in a country's democratic experience were not correlated with GDP per capita between 1995 and 2015 (ρ=-0·1036; p=0·1826), but were correlated with declines in mortality from cardiovascular disease (ρ=-0·3873; p<0·0001) and increases in government health spending (ρ=0·4002; p<0·0001). Removal of free and fair elections from the democratic experience variable resulted in loss of association with age-standardised mortality from non-communicable diseases and injuries.
interpretationWhen enforced by free and fair elections, democracies are more likely than autocracies to lead to health gains for causes of mortality (eg, cardiovascular diseases and transport injuries) that have not been heavily targeted by foreign aid and require health-care delivery infrastructure. International health agencies and donors might increasingly need to consider the implications of regime type in their efforts to maximise health gains, particularly in the context of ageing populations and the growing burden of non-communicable diseases.
fundingBloomberg Philanthropies and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.