ArticleMicrobiome2019
Streaming histogram sketching for rapid microbiome analytics.
Article in Microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reference-free k-mer based dissimilarity measures for metagenomes comparison.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Approximate nearest neighbor graph provides fast and efficient embedding with applications for large-scale biological data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- GSearch: ultra-fast and scalable genome search by combining K-mer hashing with hierarchical navigable small world graphs.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Microbiome-based classification models for fresh produce safety and quality evaluation.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Comparison of k-mer-basedMicrobiome research reports · 2023Article
- Explainable AI reveals changes in skin microbiome composition linked to phenotypic differences.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Streamlining data-intensive biology with workflow systems.GigaScience · 2021Article
- Struo2: efficient metagenome profiling database construction for ever-expanding microbial genome datasets.PeerJ · 2021Article
- Microbiota Supplementation withCell reports. Medicine · 2020Observational
- To Petabytes and beyond: recent advances in probabilistic and signal processing algorithms and their application to metagenomics.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- When the levee breaks: a practical guide to sketching algorithms for processing the flood of genomic data.Genome biology · 2019Review
- Large-scale sequence comparisons withF1000Research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe growth in publically available microbiome data in recent years has yielded an invaluable resource for genomic research, allowing for the design of new studies, augmentation of novel datasets and reanalysis of published works. This vast amount of microbiome data, as well as the widespread proliferation of microbiome research and the looming era of clinical metagenomics, means there is an urgent need to develop analytics that can process huge amounts of data in a short amount of time. To address this need, we propose a new method for tyrhe compact representation of microbiome sequencing data using similarity-preserving sketches of streaming k-mer spectra. These sketches allow for dissimilarity estimation, rapid microbiome catalogue searching and classification of microbiome samples in near real time.
resultsWe apply streaming histogram sketching to microbiome samples as a form of dimensionality reduction, creating a compressed 'histosketch' that can efficiently represent microbiome k-mer spectra. Using public microbiome datasets, we show that histosketches can be clustered by sample type using the pairwise Jaccard similarity estimation, consequently allowing for rapid microbiome similarity searches via a locality sensitive hashing indexing scheme. Furthermore, we use a 'real life' example to show that histosketches can train machine learning classifiers to accurately label microbiome samples. Specifically, using a collection of 108 novel microbiome samples from a cohort of premature neonates, we trained and tested a random forest classifier that could accurately predict whether the neonate had received antibiotic treatment (97% accuracy, 96% precision) and could subsequently be used to classify microbiome data streams in less than 3 s.
conclusionsOur method offers a new approach to rapidly process microbiome data streams, allowing samples to be rapidly clustered, indexed and classified. We also provide our implementation, Histosketching Using Little K-mers (HULK), which can histosketch a typical 2 GB microbiome in 50 s on a standard laptop using four cores, with the sketch occupying 3000 bytes of disk space. ( https://github.com/will-rowe/hulk ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.