Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30877706›Full record

ArticleDiabetes & metabolism journal2019

Impact of Longitudinal Changes in Metabolic Syndrome Status over 2 Years on 10-Year Incident Diabetes Mellitus.

Ji Hye Huh, Sung Gyun Ahn, Young In Kim, Taehwa Go, Ki Chul Sung, Jae Hyuk Choi, Kwang Kon Koh, Jang Young Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes & metabolism journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The efficacy and safety ofNutrition research and practice · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ji Hye Huh *Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5445-8007
Sung Gyun Ahn *Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1528-2739
Young In KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Taehwa GoCenter of Biomedical Data Science, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Ki Chul SungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Hyuk ChoiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kwang Kon KohDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. kwangk@gilhospital.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9243-2561
Jang Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea. kimjang713@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0813-7082
Yonsei University · KRGachon University Gil Medical Center · KRHallym University · KRKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is a known predictor of diabetes mellitus (DM), but whether longitudinal changes in MetS status modify the risk for DM remains unclear. We investigated whether changes in MetS status over 2 years modify the 10-year risk of incident DM.

methodsWe analyzed data from 7,317 participants aged 40 to 70 years without DM at baseline, who took part in 2001 to 2011 Korean Genome Epidemiology Study. Subjects were categorized into four groups based on repeated longitudinal assessment of MetS status over 2 years: non-MetS, resolved MetS, incident MetS, and persistent MetS. The hazard ratio (HR) of new-onset DM during 10 years was calculated in each group using Cox models.

resultsDuring the 10-year follow-up, 1,099 participants (15.0%) developed DM. Compared to the non-MetS group, the fully adjusted HRs for new-onset DM were 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.79) in the resolved MetS group, 1.75 (95% CI, 1.30 to 2.37) in the incident MetS group, and 1.98 (95% CI, 1.50 to 2.61) in the persistent MetS group (

conclusionWe found that discrete longitudinal changes pattern in MetS status over 2 years associated with 10-year risk of DM. These findings suggest that monitoring change of MetS status and controlling it in individuals may be important for risk prediction of DM.

Indexed as

Health StatusAdultAgedDiabetes MellitusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateLife StyleMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRepublic of KoreaRisk FactorsDiabetes mellitusLife styleMetabolic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID30877706
PMCPMC6712218
OpenAlexW2917412847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.