Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30877636›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2019

Correlation of radiological and immunochemical parameters with clinical outcome in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with Bevacizumab.

R A Manneh Kopp, J M Sepúlveda-Sánchez, Y Ruano, O Toldos, A Pérez Núñez, D Cantero, A Hilario, A Ramos, G de Velasco, P Sánchez-Gómez and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

R A Manneh KoppMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
J M Sepúlveda-SánchezMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Y RuanoDepartment of Pathology (Neuropathology), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
O ToldosDepartment of Pathology (Neuropathology), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
A Pérez NúñezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
D CanteroDepartment of Pathology (Neuropathology), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
A HilarioDepartments Radiology (A.H., A.R.), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
A RamosDepartments Radiology (A.H., A.R.), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
G de VelascoMedical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
P Sánchez-GómezNeuro-Oncology Unit, Health Institute Carlos III-UFIEC, Madrid, Spain.
A Hernández-LaínDepartment of Pathology (Neuropathology), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041, Madrid, Spain. aurelio.hlain@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1642-4505

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI/13/01258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome phase 2 trials had reported encouraging progression-free survival with Bevacizumab in monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy in glioblastoma. However, phase 3 trials showed a significant improvement in progression free survival without a benefit in overall survival. To date, there are no predictive biomarker of response for Bevacizumab in glioblastoma.

methodsWe used Immunochemical analysis on tumor samples and pretreatment and post-treatment perfusion-MRI to try to identify possible predictive angiogenesis-related biomarkers of response and survival in patients with glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in the first recurrence. We analyzed histological parameters: vascular proliferation, mitotic number and Ki-67 index; molecular factors: MGMT promoter methylation, EGFR amplification and EGFR variant III; immunohistochemical: MET, Midkine, HIF1, VEGFA, VEGF-R2, CD44, Olig2, microvascular area and microvascular density; and radiological: rCBV.

resultsIn the statistical analysis, no significant correlation of any histological, molecular, microvascular or radiological parameters could be demonstrated with the response rate, PFS or OS with bevacizumab treatment.

conclusionUnfortunately, in this histopathological, molecular, immunohistochemical and neuroradiological study we did not find any predictive biomarker of response or survival benefit for Bevacizumab in glioblastoma.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCerebrovascular CirculationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGene AmplificationGenes, erbB-1GlioblastomaHumansImmunohistochemistryAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesKi-67 AntigenMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsBevacizumabBiomarkersGlioblastomaMicrovacular densityMicrovascular area

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.