ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019
A novel image-based retrieval system for characterization of maxillofacial lesions in cone beam CT images.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of artificial intelligence in the detection and segmentation of oral and maxillofacial structures using cone-beam computed tomography images: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Polish journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Current applications and development of artificial intelligence for digital dental radiography.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2022Article
- 3D morphometric quantification of maxillae and defects for patients with unilateral cleft palate via deep learning-based CBCT image auto-segmentation.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2021Article
- Current Applications, Opportunities, and Limitations of AI for 3D Imaging in Dental Research and Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe objective of medical content-based image retrieval (CBIR) is to assist clinicians in decision making by retrieving the most similar cases to a given query image from a large database. Herein, a new method for content-based image retrieval of cone beam CT (CBCT) scans is presented.
methodsThe introduced framework consists of two main phases: training database construction and querying. The goal of the training phase is database construction, which consists of three main steps. First, automatic segmentation of lesions using 3D symmetry analysis is performed. Embedding the prior shape knowledge of the 3D symmetry characteristics of the healthy human head structure increases the accuracy of automatic segmentation. Then, spatial pyramid matching is used for feature extraction, and the relative importance of each feature is learned using classifiers.
resultsThe method was applied to a dataset of 1145 volumetric CBCT images with four classes of maxillofacial lesions. A symmetry-based analysis model for automatic lesion segmentation was evaluated using similarity measures. Mean Dice coefficients of 0.89, 0.85, 0.92, and 0.87 were achieved for maxillary sinus perforation, radiolucent lesion, unerupted tooth, and root fracture classes, respectively. Moreover, the execution time of automatic segmentation was reduced to 3 min per case. The performance of the proposed search engine was evaluated using mean average precision and normalized discounted cumulative gain. A mean average retrieval accuracy and normalized discounted cumulative gain of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively, were achieved.
conclusionQuantitative results show that the proposed approach is more effective than previous methods in the literature, and it can facilitate the introduction of CBIR in clinical CBCT applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.