Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30877613›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2019

Cluster headache: crosspoint between otologists and neurologists-treatment of the sphenopalatine ganglion and systematic review.

Cecilia Rosso, Giovanni Felisati, Antonio Bulfamante, Carlotta Pipolo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05365880 (Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Headache), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05365880 phase2withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Headache

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2022 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsHeadache, Stroke, Ischemic StrokeArmsLiquid Lidocaine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sensory function in headache: a comparative study among patients with cluster headache, migraine, tension-type headache, and asymptomatic subjects.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cecilia RossoOtorhinolaryngology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni FelisatiOtorhinolaryngology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy. giovanni.felisati@gmail.com.
Antonio BulfamanteOtorhinolaryngology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Carlotta PipoloOtorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Ospedale San Paolo · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among cephalgias, cluster headache (CH) is the rarest and the most disabling, explaining the appellation of "suicide headache." Up to 20% of chronic CH reveals to be resistant to pharmacological treatments, in which case interventional procedures should be considered. Many reports evaluated invasive approaches and a wide strand of research is dedicated to the sphenopalatine ganglion. Our paper will now be focused on providing an overview on modern applications on the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG), their outcomes, and their feasibility in terms of risks and benefits. The group reviewed the international literature systematically for procedures targeting the sphenopalatine ganglion and its branches for episodic and chronic CH, including block, stimulation, radiofrequency, stereotactic radiosurgery, and vidian neurectomy. Seventeen articles fixed our inclusion criteria. Comparing the outcomes that have been analyzed, it is possible to notice how the most successful procedure for the treatment of refractory chronic and episodic CH is the SPG block, which reaches respectively 76.5% and 87% of efficacy. Radiofrequency has a wide range of outcomes, from 33 to 70.3% in CCH. Stimulation of SPG only achieved up to 55% of outcomes in significant reduction in attack frequency in CCH and 71% in ECH. Radiosurgery and vidian neurectomy on SPG have also been analyzed. Generally, ECH patients show better response to standard medical therapies; nevertheless, even this more manageable condition may sometimes benefit from interventional therapies mostly reserved for CCH. First results seem promising and considering the low frequency of side effects or complications, we should think of expanding the indications of the procedures also to those conditions. Outcomes certainly suggest that further studies are necessary in order to understand which method is the most effective and with less side effects. Placebo-controlled studies would be pivotal, and tight collaboration between neurologists and otorhinolaryngologists should also be central in order to give correct indications, which allow us to expect procedures on the SPG to be an effective and mostly safe method to control either refractory ECH or CCH.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyNeurologistsSphenopalatine Ganglion BlockCluster HeadacheGanglia, ParasympatheticHumansOtolaryngologistsCephalgiaCluster headacheEndoscopic transnasal approachRefractory headacheSphenopalatine ganglion

Identifiers

PMID30877613
OpenAlexW2921326887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.