ArticleOecologia2019
Interactive effects between donor and recipient species mediate fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt in a co-flowering community.
Article in Oecologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-flowering richness has variable effects on pollen quantity and quality limitation in four Clarkia species.Annals of botany · 2024Article
- Flower visits and pollinator pollen load networks reveal the effects of pollinator sharing on heterospecific pollen transfer in a subalpine plant community.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Heterospecific pollen avoidance strategy prevails in the generalized plant-pollinator network on Yongxing Island.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Flowering Time Variation in Two Sympatric Tree Species Contributes to Avoid Competition for Pollinator Services.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Spatial variation of pollen receipt and effects of heterospecific pollen on seed set inEcology and evolution · 2023Article
- Pollination success increases with plant diversity in high-Andean communities.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Causes and consequences of variation in heterospecific pollen receipt in Oenothera fruticosa.American journal of botany · 2021Article
- Article
- Post-pollination barriers enable coexistence of pollinator-sharing ornithophilous Erica species.Journal of plant research · 2020Article
- Floral traits are associated with the quality but not quantity of heterospecific stigmatic pollen loads.BMC ecology · 2020Article
- Effect of heterospecific pollen deposition on pollen tube growth depends on the phylogenetic relatedness between donor and recipient.AoB PLANTS · 2020Article
- Pollen on stigmas as proxies of pollinator competition and facilitation: complexities, caveats and future directions.Annals of botany · 2020Article
- Plant-pollinator network structural properties differentially affect pollen transfer dynamics and pollination success.Oecologia · 2020Article
- Floral Color Properties of Serpentine Seep Assemblages Depend on Community Size and Species Richness.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluation of pollen transfer in wild plant communities revealing heterospecific pollen receipt is common, yet experimental hand pollinations have revealed high among-species variation in the magnitude of its effect on recipient fitness. The causes of this among-species variation are unknown, however, prompting the investigation of underlying factors. Here, we conducted a hand-pollination experiment with ten co-flowering species to determine whether the effects of heterospecific pollen receipt are mediated by the pollen donor or recipient species alone, or whether the effects are determined by the interaction between them. We further assessed species traits potentially mediating interactive effects in heterospecific pollen receipt by evaluating the relationship between heterospecific pollen effect size and three different predictors reflecting a unique combination of pollen donor and recipient characteristics. Our results show, for the first time, that the magnitude of the heterospecific pollen receipt effect is determined by the specific combination of donor and recipient species (i.e., interactive effects). However, we were unable to uncover the specific combination of traits mediating these effects. Overall, our study provides strong evidence that an understanding of heterospecific pollen receipt effects based on recipient or donor characteristics alone may be insufficient. This study is an important step toward an understanding of consequences of heterospecific pollen receipt in co-flowering communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30877578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.