Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30877502›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2019

Promoting Personal and Social Recovery in Older Persons with Schizophrenia: The Case of The New Club, a Novel Dutch Facility Offering Social Contact and Activities.

Paul D Meesters, Lia van der Ham, Marcia Dominicus, Max L Stek, Tineke A Abma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul D MeestersDepartment of Research and Education, GGZ Friesland Mental Health Services, Sixmastraat 2, 8932PA, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. pauldavid.meesters@ggzfriesland.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0221-2149
Lia van der HamAthena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcia DominicusDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Grip Psychologen, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Max L StekDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tineke A AbmaAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many older community-living persons with schizophrenia report unmet psychological and social needs. The Amsterdam-based New Club is a novel facility that intends to foster self-reliance and social participation in this group. To explore participants' and staff perceptions, a naturalistic qualitative study combined participant observation with interviews. The results illustrate how the New Club contributes to the personal and social recovery of its participants. At the personal level, attending the facility, activation and feeling accepted were valued positively. At the social level, engaging with others, experiencing a sense of community, and learning from one another's social skills were positive contributors. Next, various environmental factors proved important. The New Club demonstrates the feasibility of creating a facility that offers an accepting and non-demanding social environment to older community-living individuals with severe mental illnesses. It may offer a suitable alternative for the more demanding psychotherapeutic interventions offered to younger populations.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCommunity Mental Health CentersSchizophrenic PsychologyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSchizophreniaSocial BehaviorSocial EnvironmentSocial ParticipationOlderPersonalQualitativeRecoverySchizophreniaSocial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.