Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30877486›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates in the community, Switzerland.

Linda Mueller, Cansu Cimen, Laurent Poirel, Marie-Christine Descombes, Patrice Nordmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Bacteriological and molecular study of fosfomycin resistance in uropathogenic Escherichia coli.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fosfomycin resistance mechanisms inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Emergence of Fosfomycin Resistance by Plasmid-MediatedAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda MuellerEmerging Antibiotic Resistance Unit, Medical and Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 18, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland. linda.mueller@unifr.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-8663
Cansu CimenEmerging Antibiotic Resistance Unit, Medical and Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 18, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Laurent PoirelEmerging Antibiotic Resistance Unit, Medical and Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 18, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Marie-Christine DescombesLaboratoire Proxilis, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Patrice NordmannEmerging Antibiotic Resistance Unit, Medical and Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 18, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation FNS-407240_177382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of fosfomycin-resistant strains among ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates recovered from community patients in Switzerland. A total of 1225 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates were collected between 2012 and 2013 from a private and community laboratory. Fosfomycin resistance was assessed by using the novel rapid fosfomycin/E. coli NP test and agar dilution method. Resistant isolates were further investigated for acquired resistance genes fosA1-7 by PCR and sequencing. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) were performed to evaluate the clonal relationship among fosA3-carrying isolates. Out of the 1225 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates analyzed in this study, 1208 were fosfomycin susceptible while 17 were fosfomycin resistant. No discrepancy was observed between the rapid fosfomycin/E. coli NP test and the agar dilution method taken as the gold standard. Five out of the 17 resistant isolates carried a fosA-like gene. No clonal relationship was observed among those isolates. Here, the prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among ESBL-producing E. coli isolates in the community is reported for the first time in Switzerland, being ca. 1.4%. Among the five isolates carrying a fosA gene, four encoded the FosA3 enzyme, being the most prevalent fosfomycin-resistant determinant. An excellent correlation was observed between minimum inhibitory concentration-based susceptibility categorization and results of the rapid fosfomycin/E. coli NP test, further indicating the excellent sensitivity and specificity of this recently developed rapid test whose results are obtained in less than 2 h.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsFosfomycinHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular TypingPrevalenceSequence Analysis, DNASwitzerlandAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsFosfomycinEnterobacteralesRapid test

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.