Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30877200›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2019

Cellular sensing by phase separation: Using the process, not just the products.

Haneul Yoo, Catherine Triandafillou, D Allan Drummond

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Synaptic Proteostasis in Health and Disease.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. A molecular grammar for programmable multiphase protein-RNA vesicles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Theoretical limits for sensing through phase separation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haneul YooFrom the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Catherine TriandafillouGraduate Program in the Biophysical Sciences, and.
D Allan DrummondFrom the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, dadrummond@uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7018-7059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase separation creates two distinct liquid phases from a single mixed liquid phase, like oil droplets separating from water. Considerable attention has focused on how the products of phase separation-the resulting condensates-might act as biological compartments, bioreactors, filters, and membraneless organelles in cells. Here, we expand this perspective, reviewing recent results showing how cells instead use the process of phase separation to sense intracellular and extracellular changes. We review case studies in phase separation-based sensing and discuss key features, such as extraordinary sensitivity, which make the process of phase separation ideally suited to meet a range of sensory challenges cells encounter.

Indexed as

Phase TransitionCell CompartmentationCytoplasmOrganellesbiophysicsbiosensorcell biologycellular regulationcyclic GMP-AMP synthasephase separationphase transitionpoly(A)-binding proteinstress responseSup35

Identifiers

PMID30877200
PMCPMC6509497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.