Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30877198›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2019

The chaperone ERp29 is required for tunneling nanotube formation by stabilizing MSec.

Rajaiah Pergu, Sunayana Dagar, Harsh Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, Jayanta Bhattacharya, Sivaram V S Mylavarapu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Building the bridges: molecular mechanisms of tunneling nanotube formation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A role for tunneling nanotubes in virus spread.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Intercellular Highways in Transport Processes.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Tunneling Nanotubes: A New Target for Nanomedicine?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rajaiah PerguFrom the Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, Regional Centre for Biotechnology, and.
Sunayana DagarFrom the Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, Regional Centre for Biotechnology, and.
Harsh KumarFrom the Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, Regional Centre for Biotechnology, and.
Rajesh Kumarthe HIV Vaccine Translational Research Laboratory, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Faridabad Haryana 121001.
Jayanta Bhattacharyathe HIV Vaccine Translational Research Laboratory, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Faridabad Haryana 121001.
Sivaram V S MylavarapuFrom the Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics, Regional Centre for Biotechnology, and sivaram@rcb.res.in.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-1362
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute · INRegional Centre for Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) are membrane conduits that mediate long-distance intercellular cross-talk in several organisms and play vital roles during development, pathogenic transmission, and cancer metastasis. However, the molecular mechanisms of TNT formation and function remain poorly understood. The protein MSec (also known as TNFα-induced protein 2 (TNFAIP2) and B94) is essential for TNT formation in multiple cell types. Here, using affinity protein purification, mass spectrometric identification, and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy assays, we found that MSec interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone ERp29. siRNA-mediated ERp29 depletion in mammalian cells significantly reduces TNT formation, whereas its overexpression induces TNT formation, but in a strictly MSec-dependent manner. ERp29 stabilized MSec protein levels, but not its mRNA levels, and the chaperone activity of ERp29 was required for maintaining MSec protein stability. Subcellular ER fractionation and subsequent limited proteolytic treatment suggested that MSec is associated with the outer surface of the ER. The ERp29-MSec interaction appeared to require the presence of other bridging protein(s), perhaps triggered by post-translational modification of ERp29. Our study implicates MSec as a target of ERp29 and reveals an indispensable role for the ER in TNT formation, suggesting new modalities for regulating TNT numbers in cells and tissues.

Indexed as

NanotubesAnimalsCell Line, TumorCytokinesHeat-Shock ProteinsHumansMiceRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingCytokinesERP29 protein, humanHeat-Shock ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingTNFAIP2 protein, humancell-cell interactionchaperoneendoplasmic reticulumendoplasmic reticulum (ER)endoplasmic reticulum protein 29 (ERP29)interactomeintercellular communicationMSecplasma membranepost-translational modification (PTM)protein-disulfide isomeraseprotein stabilityTNFα-induced protein 2 (TNAIP2)tunneling nanotubes

Identifiers

PMID30877198
PMCPMC6509506
OpenAlexW2921792934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.