Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30877125›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2019

DamID as a versatile tool for understanding gene regulation.

Gabriel N Aughey, Seth W Cheetham, Tony D Southall

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The role of inner nuclear membrane protein emerin in myogenesis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Host RNA NMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  8. Damsel: analysis and visualisation of DamID sequencing in R.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Genome organization in cardiomyocytes expressing mutated A-type lamins.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. iScience · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Nuclear organization and regulation of the differentiated state.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriel N AugheyDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Ernst Chain Building, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Seth W CheethamMater Research Institute-University of Queensland, TRI Building, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6428-3175
Tony D SouthallDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Ernst Chain Building, London, SW7 2AZ, UK t.southall@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8645-4198
Imperial College London · GBThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P017924/1Wellcome Trust 104567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction of proteins and RNA with chromatin underlies the regulation of gene expression. The ability to profile easily these interactions is fundamental for understanding chromatin biology

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenetic TechniquesAnimalsBinding SitesChromatinDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression RegulationGenomicsHumansMiceProtein BindingRibosomesSequence Analysis, DNASite-Specific DNA-Methyltransferase (Adenine-Specific)ChromatinSite-Specific DNA-Methyltransferase (Adenine-Specific)ChromatinDamIDGene regulationGenomics

Identifiers

PMID30877125
PMCPMC6451315
OpenAlexW2922042625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.