Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30877082›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Cleaning Genotype Data from Diversity Outbred Mice.

Karl W Broman, Daniel M Gatti, Karen L Svenson, Śaunak Sen, Gary A Churchill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sex-specific systemic metabolic predictors of resistance to calorie restriction-induced weight loss in obese diversity outbred mice.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gene expression genetics of the striatum of Diversity Outbred mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karl W BromanDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 broman@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4914-6671
Daniel M GattiThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609.ORCID 0000-0003-0667-9926
Karen L SvensonThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609.ORCID 0000-0002-7928-1911
Śaunak SenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163.ORCID 0000-0003-4519-6361
Gary A ChurchillThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609.ORCID 0000-0001-9190-9284

Funding

Systems Genetic Analysis of Multi-parent CrossesR01GM070683 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BROMAN, KARL W, CHURCHILL, GARY A · 2004 to 2022
$6.8M
TIM Project NIDA P30 CenterP30DA044223 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI SABA, LAURA MAREN, WILLIAMS, ROBERT W. · 2017 to 2021
$3.9M
A Unified High Performance Web Service for Systems Genetics and Precision MedicineR01GM123489 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI PRINS, PJOTR, SEN, SAUNAK · 2017 to 2024
$3.7M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA044223NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070683NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data cleaning is an important first step in most statistical analyses, including efforts to map the genetic loci that contribute to variation in quantitative traits. Here we illustrate approaches to quality control and cleaning of array-based genotyping data for multiparent populations (experimental crosses derived from more than two founder strains), using MegaMUGA array data from a set of 291 Diversity Outbred (DO) mice. Our approach employs data visualizations that can reveal problems at the level of individual mice or with individual SNP markers. We find that the proportion of missing genotypes for each mouse is an effective indicator of sample quality. We use microarray probe intensities for SNPs on the X and Y chromosomes to confirm the sex of each mouse, and we use the proportion of matching SNP genotypes between pairs of mice to detect sample duplicates. We use a hidden Markov model (HMM) reconstruction of the founder haplotype mosaic across each mouse genome to estimate the number of crossovers and to identify potential genotyping errors. To evaluate marker quality, we find that missing data and genotyping error rates are the most effective diagnostics. We also examine the SNP genotype frequencies with markers grouped according to their minor allele frequency in the founder strains. For markers with high apparent error rates, a scatterplot of the allele-specific probe intensities can reveal the underlying cause of incorrect genotype calls. The decision to include or exclude low-quality samples can have a significant impact on the mapping results for a given study. We find that the impact of low-quality markers on a given study is often minimal, but reporting problematic markers can improve the utility of the genotyping array across many studies.

Indexed as

BiodiversityGenetic VariationGenotypeAllelesAnimalsAnimals, Outbred StrainsCrosses, GeneticFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic MarkersMaleMicePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociGenetic Markersdata cleaningdata diagnosticsMPPMultiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (MAGIC)multiparental populationsQTLquantitative trait loci

Identifiers

PMID30877082
PMCPMC6505173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.