ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019
Cleaning Genotype Data from Diversity Outbred Mice.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A panel of Diversity Outbred mouse embryonic stem cells: enabling the functional characterization of natural genetic variationbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Sex-specific systemic metabolic predictors of resistance to calorie restriction-induced weight loss in obese diversity outbred mice.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025Article
- Genetic variance in the murine defensin locus modulates glucose homeostasis.The EMBO journal · 2025Article
- Unraveling the genetics of arsenic toxicity with cellular morphology QTL.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Multiple genetic loci influence vaccine-induced protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in genetically diverse mice.PLoS pathogens · 2024Article
- Cell morphology QTL reveal gene by environment interactions in a genetically diverse cell population.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Identification of genomic loci regulating platelet plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in mice.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2023Article
- Gene expression genetics of the striatum of Diversity Outbred mice.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Article
- Integrative analysis of hepatic transcriptional profiles reveals genetic regulation of atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic Diversity Outbred-F1 mice.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Gene expression genetics of the striatum of Diversity Outbred mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Behavioral phenotypes revealed during reversal learning are linked with novel genetic loci in diversity outbred mice.Addiction neuroscience · 2022Article
- A generic hidden Markov model for multiparent populations.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Synergizing Mouse and Human Studies to Understand the Heterogeneity of Obesity.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Review
- Systems genetics in diversity outbred mice inform BMD GWAS and identify determinants of bone strength.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Article
- A large-scale genome-lipid association map guides lipid identification.Nature metabolism · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data cleaning is an important first step in most statistical analyses, including efforts to map the genetic loci that contribute to variation in quantitative traits. Here we illustrate approaches to quality control and cleaning of array-based genotyping data for multiparent populations (experimental crosses derived from more than two founder strains), using MegaMUGA array data from a set of 291 Diversity Outbred (DO) mice. Our approach employs data visualizations that can reveal problems at the level of individual mice or with individual SNP markers. We find that the proportion of missing genotypes for each mouse is an effective indicator of sample quality. We use microarray probe intensities for SNPs on the X and Y chromosomes to confirm the sex of each mouse, and we use the proportion of matching SNP genotypes between pairs of mice to detect sample duplicates. We use a hidden Markov model (HMM) reconstruction of the founder haplotype mosaic across each mouse genome to estimate the number of crossovers and to identify potential genotyping errors. To evaluate marker quality, we find that missing data and genotyping error rates are the most effective diagnostics. We also examine the SNP genotype frequencies with markers grouped according to their minor allele frequency in the founder strains. For markers with high apparent error rates, a scatterplot of the allele-specific probe intensities can reveal the underlying cause of incorrect genotype calls. The decision to include or exclude low-quality samples can have a significant impact on the mapping results for a given study. We find that the impact of low-quality markers on a given study is often minimal, but reporting problematic markers can improve the utility of the genotyping array across many studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.