Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30876957›Full record

Observational studyJournal of pain and symptom management2019

Interprofessional Teamwork During Family Meetings in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

Jennifer K Walter, Emily Sachs, Theodore E Schall, Aaron G Dewitt, Victoria A Miller, Robert M Arnold, Chris Feudtner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Family Meetings in Palliative Care: Benefits and Barriers.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer K WalterChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: Walterj1@email.chop.edu.
Emily SachsChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Theodore E SchallChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Aaron G DewittChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Victoria A MillerChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Robert M ArnoldUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Chris FeudtnerChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Supplement to Improving Family Meetings in the Pediatric CICUK23HL141700 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI WALTER, JENNIFER K · 2019 to 2023
$981k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL141700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextParents of children in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) report inadequate communication and a lack of empathy during conversations with their clinicians.

objectiveTo assess quantitatively and qualitatively the contributions made by team members of different professions in communicating with parents during family meetings.

methodsProspective observational study. The study was conducted in the pediatric CICU at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Subjects were members of the interprofessional team attending family meetings for patients admitted to the CICU longer than two weeks. We used quantitative conversation attribution and coding to compare durations of attendee contributions and contribution type by professional role. The SCOPE codebook and other quantitative codes drawn from best practices in family meetings were used to measure communication behaviors. A qualitative analysis of nurses' and social workers' contributions was used to identify themes not otherwise captured.

resultsAcross 10 meetings, physicians spoke for an average of 78.1% (SD 10.7%) of each meeting, nonphysicians 9.6% (SD 7.8%), and parents 17.4% (SD 12.2%). Parental understanding was assessed an average of 0.2 (SD 0.4) times per meeting. Parents expressed emotion an average of 4.2 times per meeting (SD 7.1), and the clinical team responded empathetically 2.2 times per meeting (SD 4.3). All clinician empathic responses were a minority of their overall contributions. Conversation was almost exclusively between physicians and families until physicians indicated other team members could contribute.

conclusionsCoordination of team members' roles in the meetings may improve parental engagement necessary for decision-making and empathic responses that are often missed.

Indexed as

Professional-Family RelationsAdultCardiac Care FacilitiesChildCommunicationDecision MakingEmpathyFemaleHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleNursesParentsPatient Care TeamPhysiciansProspective Studiesfamily meetingInterprofessional communicationinterprofessional teamspediatric cardiac intensive careprovider-patient communication

Identifiers

PMID30876957
PMCPMC6800054
OpenAlexW2922264570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.