Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30876859›Full record

ArticleBrain research2019

Environmental enrichment and amantadine confer individual but nonadditive enhancements in motor and spatial learning after controlled cortical impact injury.

Isabel H Bleimeister, Mia Wolff, Tracey R Lam, Derrick M Brooks, Reece Patel, Jeffrey P Cheng, Corina O Bondi, Anthony E Kline

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabel H BleimeisterPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Mia WolffPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Tracey R LamPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Derrick M BrooksPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Reece PatelPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Jeffrey P ChengPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Corina O BondiPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Anthony E KlinePhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States. Electronic address: klineae@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Optimizing Environmental Enrichment to Model Preclinical NeurorehabilitationR01NS084967 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2014 to 2025
$3.7M
Environmental Enrichment and Cholinergic Mechanisms after TBIR01NS060005 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Understanding the Impact of Antipsychotic Drugs on Recovery After TBIR01HD069620 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Effects of Chronic Adolescent Stress on Cognitive and Emotional Behavior After Adult TBIR21NS099674 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2017 to 2018
$429k
Multimodal Assessment of Behavioral flexibility after Frontal Brain TraumaR21NS099683 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONDI, CORINA OANA · 2016 to 2017
$426k
Sustained Attention and Executive Functioning After Brain TraumaR03NS094950 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONDI, CORINA OANA · 2016 to 2017
$154k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069620NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060005NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084967NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS094950NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS099674NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS099683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental enrichment (EE) and amantadine (AMT) enhance motor and cognitive outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there are no data on the effects of combining these two therapies. Hence, the aim of the current study was to combine EE and AMT after TBI to determine if their net effect further enhances motor and cognitive performance. Anesthetized adult male rats received either a cortical impact of moderate severity or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to EE or standard (STD) housing and once daily administration of AMT (20 mg/kg; i.p.) or saline vehicle (VEH, 1 mL/kg; i.p.) beginning 24 h after injury for 19 days. Motor and cognitive function were assessed on post-surgical days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volume was quantified on day 21. There were no statistical differences among the sham groups regardless of therapy, so the data were pooled. EE, AMT, and their combination (EE + AMT) improved beam-balance, but only EE and EE + AMT enhanced beam-walking. All three treatment paradigms improved spatial learning and memory relative to the VEH-treated STD controls (p < 0.05). No differences were revealed between the EE groups, regardless of treatment, but both were better than the AMT-treated STD group on beam-walking and spatial learning (p < 0.05). Both EE groups equally reduced cortical lesion volume relative to the STD-housed AMT and VEH groups (p < 0.05). The results indicate that although beneficial on their own, EE + AMT do not provide additional benefits after TBI. It is important to note that the lack of additive effects using the current treatment and behavioral protocols does not detract from the benefits of each individual therapy. The findings provide insight for future combination studies.

Indexed as

AmantadineAnimalsBrain Injuries, TraumaticCognitionDisease Models, AnimalEnvironmentMaleMaze LearningMemoryMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpatial LearningAmantadineAmantadineBeam-walkControlled cortical impactFunctional recoveryLearning and memoryMorris water mazeTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID30876859
PMCPMC6476676
OpenAlexW2922010857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.