Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30876456›Full record

ReviewStem cell research & therapy2019

Skin tissue regeneration for burn injury.

Anastasia Shpichka, Denis Butnaru, Evgeny A Bezrukov, Roman B Sukhanov, Anthony Atala, Vitaliy Burdukovskii, Yuanyuan Zhang, Peter Timashev

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 399 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Indications for the use of dermal substitutes in patients with acute burns and in reconstructive surgery after burns: A systematic review.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anastasia ShpichkaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. ana-shpichka@yandex.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-9918-9979
Denis ButnaruSechenov Biomedical Science and Technology Park, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Evgeny A BezrukovDepartment of Urology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Roman B SukhanovDepartment of Urology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Anthony AtalaWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Vitaliy BurdukovskiiBaikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulan-Ude, Russia.
Yuanyuan ZhangWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Peter TimashevInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Sechenov University · RUForest Institute · USBaikal Institute of Nature Management · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skin is the largest organ of the body, which meets the environment most directly. Thus, the skin is vulnerable to various damages, particularly burn injury. Skin wound healing is a serious interaction between cell types, cytokines, mediators, the neurovascular system, and matrix remodeling. Tissue regeneration technology remarkably enhances skin repair via re-epidermalization, epidermal-stromal cell interactions, angiogenesis, and inhabitation of hypertrophic scars and keloids. The success rates of skin healing for burn injuries have significantly increased with the use of various skin substitutes. In this review, we discuss skin replacement with cells, growth factors, scaffolds, or cell-seeded scaffolds for skin tissue reconstruction and also compare the high efficacy and cost-effectiveness of each therapy. We describe the essentials, achievements, and challenges of cell-based therapy in reducing scar formation and improving burn injury treatment.

Indexed as

BurnsCicatrix, HypertrophicKeloidWound HealingEpidermisHumansRegenerationRegenerative MedicineBurnsCell-based therapySkin regenerationSkin substitutesStem cells

Identifiers

PMID30876456
PMCPMC6419807
OpenAlexW2927716820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.