Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30876440›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

Transformation improvement with the Standardized Pressure Agrobacterium Infiltration Device (SPAID).

Mohamad Fadhli Bin Mad' Atari, Kevin M Folta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Nanoparticles for protein delivery in planta.Current opinion in plant biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamad Fadhli Bin Mad' AtariHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, 1301 Fifield Hall, PO Box 110690, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Kevin M FoltaHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, 1301 Fifield Hall, PO Box 110690, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. kfolta@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3836-2213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe treatment of plant tissue with Agrobacterium tumefaciens is often a critical first step to both stable and transient plant transformation. In both applications bacterial suspensions are oftentimes physically introduced into plant tissues using hand-driven pressure from a needleless syringe. While effective, this approach has several drawbacks that limit reproducibility. Pressure must be provided with the syringe perfectly perpendicular to the tissue surface. The researcher must also attempt to provide even and consistent pressure, both within and between experimental replicates. These factors mean that the procedures do not always translate well between research groups or biological replicates.

resultsWe have devised a method to introduce Agrobacterium suspensions into plant leaves with greater reproducibility. Using a decommissioned dissecting microscope as an armature, a syringe body with the bacterial suspension is mounted to the nosepiece. Gentle, even pressure is applied by rotating the focus knob. The treatment force is measured using a basic kitchen scale. The development of the Standardized Pressure Agrobacterium Infiltration Device (SPAID) provides a means to deliver consistent amounts of bacterial suspensions into plant tissues with the goal of increasing reproducibility between replicates and laboratories.

Indexed as

Transformation, GeneticAgrobacterium tumefaciensArabidopsisFragariaGenetic EngineeringNicotianaPlant LeavesPlants, Genetically ModifiedReproducibility of ResultsAdventitious shootsAgrobacteriumArabidopsis thalianaDiploid strawberryFragaria vescaNicotiana benthamianaStableTransformationTransient

Identifiers

PMID30876440
PMCPMC6419847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.