Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30876367›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2019

The combined force field-sampling problem in simulations of disordered amyloid-β peptides.

James Lincoff, Sukanya Sasmal, Teresa Head-Gordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Sizes, conformational fluctuations, and SAXS profiles for intrinsically disordered proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Incorporation of DThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022
    Article
  9. Fast Polarizable Water Model for Atomistic Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Differences in the free energies between the excited states of AProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James LincoffDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.ORCID 0000000330901240
Sukanya SasmalDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.ORCID 0000000327315777
Teresa Head-GordonDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.ORCID 0000000300258987

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING GRANTT32GM008295 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HURLEY, JAMES H, WEMMER, DAVID E · 1989 to 2022
$8.1M
Calculating Ensembles of Discrete Dynamic Complexes and Condensed States of Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsR01GM127627 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Teresa L. Head-Gordon · 2018 to 2026
$2.1M
High Accuracy Computational Methods for Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyU01GM121667 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HEAD-GORDON, MARTIN PAUL, HEAD-GORDON, TERESA L. · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127627NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008295NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM121667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) can provide high resolution structural ensembles if the force field is accurate enough and if the simulation sufficiently samples the conformational space of the IDP with the correct weighting of sub-populations. Here, we investigate the combined force field-sampling problem by testing a standard force field as well as newer fixed charge force fields, the latter specifically motivated for better description of unfolded states and IDPs, and comparing them with a standard temperature replica exchange (TREx) protocol and a non-equilibrium Temperature Cool Walking (TCW) sampling algorithm. The force field and sampling combinations are used to characterize the structural ensembles of the amyloid-beta peptides Aβ42 and Aβ43, which both should be random coils as shown recently by experimental nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and 2D Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments. The results illustrate the key importance of the sampling algorithm: while the standard force field using TREx is in poor agreement with the NMR J-coupling and nuclear Overhauser effect and 2D FRET data, when using the TCW method, the standard and optimized protein-water force field combinations are in very good agreement with the same experimental data since the TCW sampling method produces qualitatively different ensembles than TREx. We also discuss the relative merit of the 2D FRET data when validating structural ensembles using the different force fields and sampling protocols investigated in this work for small IDPs such as the Aβ42 and Aβ43 peptides.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationTemperatureAmyloid beta-PeptidesIntrinsically Disordered Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30876367
PMCPMC6417907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.