Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30875841›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

Effectiveness of an Attachment-Informed Working Alliance in Interdisciplinary Pain Therapy.

Ann-Christin Pfeifer, Pamela Meredith, Paul Schröder-Pfeifer, Juan Martin Gomez Penedo, Johannes C Ehrenthal, Corinna Schroeter, Eva Neubauer, Marcus Schiltenwolf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ann-Christin PfeiferDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany. ann-christin.pfeifer@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Pamela MeredithSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. p.meredith@uq.edu.au.
Paul Schröder-PfeiferInstitute of Psychosocial Prevention at the Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 54, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany. paul.schroeder-pfeifer@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Juan Martin Gomez PenedoCONICET and Universidad de Buenos Aires, C1053 CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. jmgomezpenedo@gmail.com.
Johannes C EhrenthalInstitute of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany. Johannes.Ehrenthal@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Corinna SchroeterDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany. p.meredith@uq.edu.au.
Eva NeubauerDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany. eva.neubauer@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Marcus SchiltenwolfDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany. marcus.schiltenwolf@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01DR17021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attachment theory provides a useful framework for understanding individual differences in pain patients, especially with insecure attachment shown to be more prevalent in chronic pain patients compared to the general population. Nevertheless, there is little evidence of attachment-informed treatment approaches for this population. The present study compares outcomes from two different attachment-informed treatment modalities for clinicians, with outcomes from treatment as usual (TAU). In both intervention groups (IG1 and IG2), clinicians received bi-monthly training sessions on attachment. Additionally, clinicians in IG1 had access to the attachment diagnostics of their patients. All treatments lasted for four weeks and included a 6-month follow up. A total of 374 chronic pain patients were recruited to participate in this study (TAU = 159/IG1 = 163/IG2 = 52). Analyses were carried out using multilevel modeling with pain intensity as the outcome variable. Additionally, working alliance was tested as a mediator of treatment efficacy. The study was registered under the trial number DRKS00008715 on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). Findings show that while IG2 was efficient in enhancing treatment outcomes, IG1 did not outperform TAU. In IG2, working alliance was a mediator of outcome. Results of the present study indicate that attachment-informed treatment of chronic pain can enhance existing interdisciplinary pain therapies; however, caveats are discussed.

Indexed as

attachment-informed interventionattachment theorychronic pain

Identifiers

PMID30875841
PMCPMC6463073
OpenAlexW2921228299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.