ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019
Evaluating Primary Health Care Performance from User Perspective in China: Review of Survey Instruments and Implementation Issues.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community health workers' knowledge and attitudes toward advance directives in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Patient views of the good doctor in primary care: a qualitative study in six provinces in China.Global health research and policy · 2023Article
- Factors and key problems influencing insured's poor perceptions of convenience of basic medical insurance: a mixed methods research of a northern city in China.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Patient satisfaction impact indicators from a psychosocial perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Current status of prevention and treatment of respiratory diseases in primary care in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
- [Measuring comprehensiveness of care using the Primary Care Assessment Tool: systematic reviewEvaluación de la integralidad en la atención primaria de salud por medio de la herramienta de evaluación de la atención primaria: revisión sistemática].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022Article
- The trend in primary health care preference in China: a cohort study of 12,508 residents from 2012 to 2018.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Residents' Willingness to Maintain Contracts with Family Doctors: a Cross-sectional Study in China.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to summarize the progress of patient evaluation studies focusing on primary health care (PHC) in China, specifically in relation to survey instruments and implementation issues. Eligible studies published in English or Chinese were obtained through online searches of PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. A descriptive reporting approach was used due to variations in the measurements and administration methods between studies. A total of 471 articles were identified and of these articles; of those 91 full-text articles were included in the final analysis. Most studies used author-developed measurements with five-point Likert response scales and many used the Chinese translations of validated tools from other countries. Most instruments assessed the physical environment, medical equipment, clinical competency and convenience aspects of PHC using a satisfaction rating instead of care experience reporting. Many studies did not report the sampling approach, patient recruitment procedures and survey administration modes. The patient exit survey was the most commonly used survey implementation method. The focus on the structural dimensions of PHC, inconsistent wording, categories of response options that use satisfaction rating, and unclear survey implementation processes are common problems in patient evaluation studies of PHC in China. Further studies are necessary to identify population preferences of PHC in China in order to move towards developing Chinese value-based patient experience measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.