Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30875776›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Red and Processed Meat and Mortality in a Low Meat Intake Population.

Saeed Mastour Alshahrani, Gary E Fraser, Joan Sabaté, Raymond Knutsen, David Shavlik, Andrew Mashchak, Jan Irene Lloren, Michael J Orlich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Saeed Mastour AlshahraniSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. smalshahrani@llu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2714-7785
Gary E FraserSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. gfraser@llu.edu.
Joan SabatéSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. jsabate@llu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9063-9785
Raymond KnutsenSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. rknutsen@llu.edu.
David ShavlikSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. dshavlik@llu.edu.
Andrew MashchakSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. amashchak@llu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0684-1148
Jan Irene LlorenSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. jclloren@llu.edu.
Michael J OrlichSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. morlich@llu.edu.
Loma Linda University · US

Funding

Plant-based diets and risk of cancerU01CA152939 · NCI · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, GARY E. · 2011 to 2015
$5.7M
National Cancer Institute 1U01CA152939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associations of low-to-moderate consumption of red and processed meat with mortality would add to the evidence of possible adverse effects of these common foods. This study aims to investigate the association of red and processed meat intake with mortality. The Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2) is a prospective cohort study of ~96,000 Seventh-day Adventist men and women recruited in the US and Canada between 2002 and 2007. The final analytic sample after exclusions was 72,149. Cox proportional hazards regression was used and hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) were obtained. Diet was assessed by a validated quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), calibrated using six 24-h dietary recalls. Mortality outcome data were obtained from the National Death Index. During a mean follow-up of 11.8 years, there were 7961 total deaths, of which 2598 were Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) deaths and 1873 were cancer deaths. Unprocessed red meat was associated with risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.07⁻1.31) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.05⁻1.50). Processed meat alone was not significantly associated with risk of mortality. The combined intake of red and processed meat was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.11⁻1.36) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.12⁻1.60). These findings suggest moderately higher risks of all-cause and CVD mortality associated with red and processed meat in a low meat intake population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCanadaDietDiet RecordsDiet SurveysFemaleHumansMaleMeatMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAdventistAdventist Health Studycohortmortalityprocessed meatred meat

Identifiers

PMID30875776
PMCPMC6470727
OpenAlexW2921016808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.