Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30875772›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Relative Validity of the Eat and Track (EaT) Smartphone App for Collection of Dietary Intake Data in 18-to-30-Year Olds.

Lyndal Wellard-Cole, Juliana Chen, Alyse Davies, Adele Wong, Sharon Huynh, Anna Rangan, Margaret Allman-Farinelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lyndal Wellard-ColeNutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Science, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. lwel3754@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1514-2135
Juliana ChenNutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Science, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. jche6526@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Alyse DaviesNutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Science, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. adav5418@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Adele WongNutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Science, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. adele.wlp@gmail.com.
Sharon HuynhNutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Science, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. shuy9672@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Anna RanganNutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Science, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. anna.rangan@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1815-844X
Margaret Allman-FarinelliNutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Science, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. margaret.allman-farinelli@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6478-1374
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council LP150100831Cancer Council NSW N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Smartphone dietary assessment apps can be acceptable and valid data collection methods but have predominantly been validated in highly educated women, and none specifically measured eating-out habits in young adults. (2) Methods: Participants recorded their food and beverage consumption for three days using the Eat and Track (EaT) app, and intakes were compared with three dietitian-administered 24-h recall interviews matched to the same days as the reference method. Wilcoxon signed-rank or

Indexed as

Diet RecordsMobile ApplicationsSmartphoneAdolescentAdultAustraliaDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultappsdiet assessmentrelative validitysmartphoneyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID30875772
PMCPMC6471468
OpenAlexW2921062041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.