Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30875637›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2019

Deoxyuracil in DNA and disease: Genomic signal or managed situation?

James Chon, Martha S Field, Patrick J Stover

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. CDADC1 is a vertebrate-specific dCTP deaminase that metabolizes gemcitabine and decitabine to prevent cellular toxicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neural Tube Defects and Folate Deficiency: Is DNA Repair Defective?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Detection of Genomic Uracil Patterns.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James ChonGraduate Field of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Martha S FieldDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, 127 Savage Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Patrick J StoverGraduate Field of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA; Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, 127 Savage Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. Electronic address: Patrick.Stover@ag.tamu.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Homeostatic Regulation of Folate MetabolismR37DK058144 · NIDDK · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI STOVER, PATRICK J · 2012 to 2021
$3.7M
GENE-NUTRIENT INTERACTIONS IN NEURAL TUBE DEFECTSR01HD059120 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI STOVER, PATRICK J · 2008 to 2018
$3.4M
Homeostatic Regulation of Folate MetabolismR01DK058144 · NIDDK · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI STOVER, PATRICK J · 2002 to 2010
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059120NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK058144NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK058144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic instability is implicated in the etiology of several deleterious health outcomes including megaloblastic anemia, neural tube defects, and neurodegeneration. Uracil misincorporation and its repair are known to cause genomic instability by inducing DNA strand breaks leading to apoptosis, but there is emerging evidence that uracil incorporation may also result in broader modifications of gene expression, including: changes in transcriptional stalling, strand break-mediated transcriptional upregulation, and direct promoter inhibition. The factors that influence uracil levels in DNA are cytosine deamination, de novo thymidylate (dTMP) biosynthesis, salvage dTMP biosynthesis, dUTPase, and DNA repair. There is evidence that the nuclear localization of the enzymes in these pathways in mammalian cells may modify and/or control the levels of uracil accumulation into nuclear DNA. Uracil sequencing technologies demonstrate that uracil in DNA is not distributed stochastically across the genome, but instead shows patterns of enrichment. Nuclear localization of the enzymes that modify uracil in DNA may serve to change these patterns of enrichment in a tissue-specific manner, and thereby signal the genome in response to metabolic and/or nutritional state of the cell.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiseaseDNAGene Expression RegulationGenomeGenomic InstabilityHumansUracilDNAUracilDNA repairdUTPaseFolate deficiencyNeural tube defectsThymidylateUracil in DNA

Identifiers

PMID30875637
PMCPMC6481626
OpenAlexW2917138293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.