Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30875456›Full record

SynthesisArthritis care & research2020

Comparative Risk of Cardiovascular Events With Biologic and Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Siddharth Singh, Mathurin Fumery, Abha G Singh, Namrata Singh, Larry J Prokop, Parambir S Dulai, William J Sandborn, Jeffrey R Curtis

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arthritis care & research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Stroke in autoimmune rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Metabolic Consequences of Rheumatoid Arthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Siddharth SinghUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla.
Mathurin FumeryAmiens University and Hospital and Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Abha G SinghUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla.
Namrata SinghUniversity of Washington, Seattle.ORCID 0000-0001-7149-363X
Larry J ProkopMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Parambir S DulaiUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla.
William J SandbornUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla.
Jeffrey R CurtisUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-8976
University of California San Diego · USMayo Clinic · USUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FRUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Comparative Risks and Benefits of Pharmacological Therapies for Older Patients with Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesK23DK117058 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SINGH, SIDDHARTH · 2018 to 2022
$971k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK117058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), non-TNFi biologics, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsUsing a systematic search through May 8, 2018, we included 14 observational studies in adults with RA treated with TNFi, non-TNFi biologics, tofacitinib, or csDMARDs, reporting the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or stroke. Only studies reporting active comparators were included. We performed random effects meta-analysis and estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

resultsAs compared to TNFi, tocilizumab was associated with a decreased risk of MACE (OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.34-1.00]), whereas csDMARDs were associated with an increased risk of MACE (csDMARDs including methotrexate OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.09-1.93]; without methotrexate OR 2.57 [95% CI 1.32-5.00]), without heterogeneity (I

conclusionBased on meta-analysis, as compared to TNFi, tocilizumab may be associated with a reduced risk of MACE, whereas csDMARDs may be associated with an increased risk of MACE and stroke.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsCardiovascular DiseasesHumansRiskAntirheumatic AgentsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID30875456
PMCPMC6745288
OpenAlexW2921889468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.