Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30875056›Full record

Observational studyEndocrine2019

Therapeutic sequences in patients with grade 1-2 neuroendocrine tumors (NET): an observational multicenter study from the ELIOS group.

Antongiulio Faggiano, Silvana Di Maio, Carmela Mocerino, Margaret Ottaviano, Chiara De Divitiis, Valentina Guarnotta, Pasquale Dolce, Roberta Modica, Ivana Puliafito, Lucia Tozzi and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Endocrine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long-term toxicity of tandem radioligand therapy using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Antongiulio FaggianoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. antongiulio.faggiano@uniroma1.it.
Silvana Di MaioDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Carmela MocerinoOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy.
Margaret OttavianoOncology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Chiara De DivitiisMedical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Valentina GuarnottaDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Pasquale DolceDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Roberta ModicaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Ivana PuliafitoOncology Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, IOM-Istituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Catania, Italy.
Lucia TozziFondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, UO di Oncologia, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Antonella Di SarnoOncology Unit, AO dei Colli, Monaldi Unit, Naples, Italy.
Silvana LeoOncology Unit, Ospedale Civico, Lecce, Italy.
Ferdinando RiccardiOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy.
Giovannella PalmieriOncology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Salvatore TafutoMedical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Antonella BiancoOncology Unit, AO dei Colli, Monaldi Unit, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe BadalamentiDivision of Oncology, Department of Surgical and Oncological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Annamaria ColaoDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
ELIOS
Ospedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITOspedale Monaldi · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany different treatments are suggested by guidelines to treat grade 1-2 (G1-G2) neuroendocrine tumors (NET). However, a precise therapeutic algorithm has not yet been established. This study aims at identifying and comparing the main therapeutic sequences in G1-G2 NET.

methodsA retrospective observational Italian multicenter study was designed to collect data on therapeutic sequences in NET. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between therapeutic sequences, as well as the number and grade of side effects and the rate of dose reduction/treatment discontinuation.

resultsAmong 1182 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia included in the ELIOS database, 131 G1-G2 gastroenteropancreatic, lung and unknown primary NET, unresectable or persistent/relapsing after surgery, treated with ≥2 systemic treatments, were included. Four main therapeutic sequences were identified in 99 patients: (A) somatostatin analogs (SSA) standard dose to SSA high dose (n = 36), (B) SSA to everolimus (n = 31), (C) SSA to chemotherapy (n = 17), (D) SSA to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) (n = 15). Median PFS of the second-line treatment was not reached in sequence A, 33 months in sequence B, 20 months in sequence C, 30 months in sequence D (p = 0.16). Both total number and severity of side effects were significantly higher in sequences B and C than A and D (p = 0.04), as well as the rate of dose reduction/discontinuation (p = 0.03).

conclusionsSSA followed by SSA high dose, everolimus, chemotherapy or PRRT represent the main therapeutic sequences in G1-G2 NET. Median PFS was not significantly different between sequences. However, the sequences with SSA high dose or PRRT seem to be better tolerated than sequences with everolimus or chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDatabases, FactualDisease ManagementEverolimusFemaleHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotidePancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSomatostatinStomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsEverolimusOctreotideSomatostatinHigh-dose somatostatin analogsNeuroendocrine tumorsPRRTSequence of treatmentsSomatostatin analoguesTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID30875056
OpenAlexW2922281471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.