Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30875008›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019

Quality of life is substantially worse for community-dwelling older people living with frailty: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thomas F Crocker, Lesley Brown, Andrew Clegg, Katherine Farley, Matthew Franklin, Samantha Simpkins, John Young

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas F CrockerAcademic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK. tom.crocker@bthft.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7450-3143
Lesley BrownAcademic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5499-9145
Andrew CleggAcademic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5972-1097
Katherine FarleyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Matthew FranklinSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2774-9439
Samantha SimpkinsRoyal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia.
John YoungAcademic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4085-9306
University of Leeds · GBBradford Royal Infirmary · GBThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFrailty is an important predictor of adverse health events in older people, and improving quality of life (QOL) is increasingly recognised as a focus for services in this population. This systematic review synthesised evidence of the relationship between frailty and QOL in community-dwelling older people, with an emphasis on how this relationship varied across QOL domains.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched five databases for reports of QOL in older people with frailty and included studies based on pre-defined criteria. We conducted meta-analyses comparing "frail" and "not frail" groups for each QOL scale where data were available. We compared pooled results to distribution-based and known-group differences to enhance interpretation. We summarised reported cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

resultsTwenty-two studies (24,419 participants) were included. There were medium or larger standardised mean differences for 24 of 31 QOL scales between frail and not frail groups, with worse QOL for frail groups. These scales encompassed constructs of health-related quality of life as well as psychological and subjective well-being. There were similar findings from mean difference meta-analyses and within-study analyses.

conclusionsThe association between frailty and lower QOL across a range of constructs is clear and often substantial. Future research should establish whether causal mechanisms link the constructs, which aspects of QOL are most important to older people with frailty, and investigate their tractability. Services focused on measuring and improving QOL for older people with frailty should be introduced.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHealth StatusHumansIndependent LivingLongitudinal StudiesMaleQuality of LifeFrailtyHealth-related quality of lifePsychological well-beingQuality of lifeSubjective well-beingSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30875008
PMCPMC6620381
OpenAlexW2921722067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.