ReviewRheumatology international2019
Systemic vasculitis involving the breast: a case report and literature review.
Review in Rheumatology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnostic dilemma of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis with an emphasis on histopathologic findings.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
- Clinicopathologic Findings in Mass Forming ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.Kidney international reports · 2022Article
- Spectrum of Large and Medium Vessel Vasculitis in Adults: Primary Vasculitides, Arthritides, Connective Tissue, and Fibroinflammatory Diseases.Current rheumatology reports · 2022Review
- Eosinophilic mastitis: a rare benign inflammatory condition and review of the literature.Journal of surgical case reports · 2022Article
- Localized Forms of Vasculitis.Current rheumatology reports · 2021Review
- A Case of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis with Various Breast Lesions as the Initial Symptoms: A Case-Based Review.Case reports in rheumatology · 2021Article
- Mastitis in Autoimmune Diseases: Review of the Literature, Diagnostic Pathway, and Pathophysiological Key Players.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Granulomatosis with polyangiitis with breast involvement mimicking metastatic cancer: Case report and literature review.European journal of rheumatology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic vasculitis involving the breast is a rare clinical condition and may mimic breast cancer or mastitis clinically or radiographically. Here, we report a case of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) with breast involvement and perform a literature review of published cases of systemic vasculitis affecting the breast to better understand this disorder. We report a case of PAN affecting the right breast in a young woman. A retrospective review was performed by searching Medline, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus for cases of systemic vasculitis involving the breast written in English up to June 1st, 2018. A 27-year-old woman presented with a painful mass in the right breast was diagnosed as PAN by the biopsy. She was treated with prednisone and methotrexate for 6 months, at which time her condition had stabilized and inflammatory markers had normalized. A total of 66 cases were identified, with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), giant cell arteritis (GCA), and PAN as the main types. The typical manifestation was mass (79.2%, 53/67) in the breast, and all diagnoses were made by the pathology of the breast biopsy. Glucocorticoid and immunosuppressant were the main therapies, and 74.6% (50/67) patients achieved remission during follow-up. Our case and a literature review of 66 cases of systemic vasculitis involving the breast reveal the importance of tissue biopsy to obtain a definitive diagnosis, because the vasculitis subtype strongly influences prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.