ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2019
[Management of bullous pemphigoid].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Paraneoplastic autoimmune dermatoses].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021Review
- [Autoimmune bullous dermatoses : Update on treatments and rare forms].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBullous pemphigoid, the most common autoimmune blistering disease of the skin in adults, is caused by autoantibodies against hemidesmosomal adhesion proteins (BP180/type XVII collagen and BP230), leading into subepidermal blistering. Therefore patients, mostly older than 70 years, show tight bullae and erosions of the skin and rarely at mucous membranes. PROBLEM: Usually the disease shows a chronically relapsing course. Thus there is a need for long-term topical corticosteroids and if necessary systemic immunosuppressives. Still there is no curative treatment available. In the context of a long-term treatment, drug-specific side effects and also a patient's comorbidities have to be taken into account.
conclusionThe choice of treatment should be based on disease activity and the extent of the muco-cutaneous manifestations. Dependent on this, high-potent topical class IV corticosteroids are used because of fewer side effects compared to systemic steroids. In case of an intense disease extent or in refractory courses treatment with systemic corticosteroids is usually combined with potentially corticosteroid-sparing immunomodulants such as dapsone or doxycycline or adjuvant immunosuppressives such as azathioprine, mycophenoles or methotrexate. Medium- to long-term an attendant immunosuppressant should be applied to reduce the use of corticosteroids. The CD20-antibody rituximab and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins are also supplemental off-label options in refractory cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.