Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30874828›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2020

A pilot digital intervention targeting loneliness in young people with psychosis.

Michelle H Lim, John F M Gleeson, Thomas L Rodebaugh, Robert Eres, Katrina M Long, Kit Casey, Jo-Anne M Abbott, Neil Thomas, David L Penn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Loneliness in prostate cancer survivors.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Loneliness in schizophrenia: Just loneliness.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michelle H LimIverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, 3122, Australia. mlim@swin.edu.au.
John F M GleesonSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia.
Thomas L RodebaughDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Robert EresIverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, 3122, Australia.
Katrina M LongIverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, 3122, Australia.
Kit CaseyCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, 3122, Australia.
Jo-Anne M AbbottAustralian Psychological Society, Melbourne, Australia.
Neil ThomasCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, 3122, Australia.
David L PennSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLoneliness has been identified as a significant challenge for people with psychosis. Interventions targeting loneliness are lacking but adopting a positive psychology approach may reduce loneliness, promote well-being, and support meaningful social interactions. Together with youth mental health consumers, we developed a digital smartphone application (app) called +Connect, which delivers positive psychology content daily for 6 weeks. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwelve participants diagnosed with a psychotic disorder were recruited from early psychosis services. Loneliness was assessed pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 3-month post-intervention. Acceptability, feasibility, and usability were measured post-intervention, including a semi-structured interview on the user's experience of +Connect.

resultsWe found evidence for the feasibility of +Connect. All but two participants completed the +Connect program, completing 95% (40.10 out of 42 days) of the program. Furthermore, 66.67% (8 out of the 12 participants) remained engaged with the program 3-months post-intervention. Our data indicates preliminary evidence that +Connect may reduce loneliness, with scores from pre-intervention (M = 50.00, SD = 8.47) to post-intervention (M = 48.10, SD = 10.38) and 3-months post-intervention (M = 42.89, SD = 7.04). We found that positive reinforcement of in-game rewards and evidence of positive mood changes added to the feasibility of the app. Regarding acceptability, while 10% (1/10 participants) reported not finding +Connect useful or enjoyable, 90% of participants agreed that +Connect helped them to increase their social confidence, enjoy life, look forward to being with other people, and feel more connected with others. Participant interviews supported these results, with participants highlighting the app's strengths in providing useful information, stimulating self-reflection, fostering positive affect, and encouraging transfer of skills into their social interactions. DISCUSSION: While preliminary findings indicated that +Connect yielded high levels of acceptability and feasibility, it is important to consider that we recruited a small and selected sample of lonely young people. Further iterations of this proof of concept app, which can incorporate participant feedback such preferences for increased personalisation, in-app feedback, and gamification, may allow an opportunity to test an improved version in the future.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdolescentCognitive Behavioral TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsLonelinessMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsPsychotic DisordersSmartphoneTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDigital interventionLonelinessPositive psychology interventionPsychosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.