Trial reportJournal of pediatric psychology2019
Acceptability and Feasibility in a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of Computerized Working Memory Training and Parental Problem-Solving Training With Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors.
Trial report in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06770335 (Strategy-based Cognitive Rehabilitation with Integrated Fatigue Management for Patients with Paediatric Brain Tumour), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Strategy-based Cognitive Rehabilitation with Integrated Fatigue Management for Patients with Paediatric Brain Tumour (PBT): an Acceptability and Feasibility Study of the Fatigue, Learning and Memory Enrichment (FLaME) Intervention
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Working memory training in pediatric brain tumor survivors after recent diagnosis: Challenges and initial effects.Applied neuropsychology. ChildTrial
- Cognitive Rehabilitation of Brain Tumor Survivors: A Systematic Review.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2025Review
- Strategy-based cognitive rehabilitation for childhood brain tumour: Protocol for an acceptability and feasibility trial of the Fatigue, Learning, and Memory Enrichment (FLaME) intervention.NIHR open research · 2025Article
- Computer-Based Cognitive Training in Children with Primary Brain Tumours: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Advances in pediatric psychooncology.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of computerized working memory training in pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) with cognitive deficits, as well as computerized working memory training that is enhanced with parental problem-solving skills training (PSST).
methodsTwenty-seven PBTS (ages 7-16) recruited from a large, tertiary academic medical center were randomly assigned to computerized working memory training (Standard; n = 14) or computerized working memory training plus PSST (Combined; n = 13). PBTS completed a baseline assessment and parents completed acceptability surveys. Primary outcomes included number of intervention sessions completed and acceptability ratings.
resultsFourteen of the 27 participants completed at least 20 sessions of the computerized training with average sessions lasting over an hour (M = 68.42 min, SD = 14.63). Completers had significantly better baseline auditory attention abilities than noncompleters. Parents reported both frustration and satisfaction related to the interventions and identified barriers to completing intervention sessions.
conclusionsThis pilot randomized clinical trial raises significant questions related to the feasibility of computerized working memory training in PBTS with cognitive deficits. Findings also offer considerations for integrating family-based treatment approaches into cognitive remediation interventions for PBTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.