Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30874385›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2019

[Short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant].

Lingfei Guo, Yinqiao Du, Mingchao Zhang, Jingyang Sun, Zhigang Jin, Yawen Peng, Junmin Shen, Yonggang Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lingfei GuoDepartment of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, P.R.China;Department of Orthopedics, the 316th Military Hospital of China, Beijing, 100093, P.R.China.
Yinqiao DuDepartment of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, P.R.China.
Mingchao ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, P.R.China;Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou Liaoning, 121000, P.R.China.
Jingyang SunDepartment of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, P.R.China.
Zhigang JinDepartment of Orthopedics, Northeast International Hospital, Shenyang Liaoning, 110000, P.R.China.
Yawen PengDepartment of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, P.R.China.
Junmin ShenDepartment of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, P.R.China.
Yonggang ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, P.R.China.zhouyg@263.net.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN302 Military Hospital of China · CNJinzhou Medical University · CNNortheastern University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant. Methods: A clinical data of 23 patients (24 knees) who underwent revision TKA by using porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve combined with MBT implant between March 2015 and April 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males (8 knees) and 15 females (16 knees). The age ranged from 48 to 85 years (mean, 65.4 years). The cause of revision TKA included infection in 14 knees, aseptic loosening in 8 knees, instability in 1 knee, and stiff knee in 1 knee. Bone defects were classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) bone defect classification. The femoral defect was rated as type ⅡA in 5 knees, type ⅡB in 17 knees, and type Ⅲ in 2 knees; the tibial defect was rated as type ⅡA in 2 knees, type ⅡB in 20 knees, and type Ⅲ in 2 knees. The mean time between primary TKA and revision TKA was 30.6 months (range, 6-86 months). The preoperative range of motion (ROM) was (56.0±24.9)°. The preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) total score was 41.9±14.2; and the pain and function scores were 8.5±5.2 and 33.4±13.5, respectively. Results: All patients were followed up 12-39 months (mean, 25.6 months). The mean operation time was 2.2 hours (range, 1.6-2.9 hours). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 580 mL (range, 400-1 000 mL). There were 2 knees (8.3%) of intraoperative fracture associated with Sleeve insertion and 1 knee (4.2%) of acute postoperative infection at 25 days after revision TKA. All incisions healed by first intention. No deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity occurred. X-ray film showed that all implants were stable. At last follow-up, slight discomfort after exercise occurred in 4 knees (16.7%); end-of-stem pain in the tibia occurred in 1 knee (4.2%). The ROM was (114.6±5.1)°, which had significant improvement compared with the preoperative result ( Conclusion: The porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve combined with MBT implant in revision TKA has a significant improvement in short-term effectiveness and no signs of implant loosening.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeMBT implantmetaphyseal bone defectrevisionSleeveTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID30874385
PMCPMC8337934
OpenAlexW3003778984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.