Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30874364›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2019

Genetic relationship between poultry and wild bird viruses during the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N6 epidemic in the Netherlands, 2017-2018.

N Beerens, R Heutink, S Pritz-Verschuren, E A Germeraad, S A Bergervoet, F Harders, A Bossers, G Koch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. When Everything Becomes Bigger: Big Data for Big Poultry Production.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N BeerensWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6756-4431
R HeutinkWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
S Pritz-VerschurenWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
E A GermeraadWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
S A BergervoetWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1857-2715
F HardersWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
A BossersWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
G KochWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Netherlands, three commercial poultry farms and two hobby holdings were infected with highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N6 virus in the winter of 2017-2018. This H5N6 virus is a reassortant of HPAI H5N8 clade 2.3.4.4 group B viruses detected in Eurasia in 2016. H5N6 viruses were also detected in several dead wild birds during the winter. However, wild bird mortality was limited compared to the caused by the H5N8 group B virus in 2016-2017. H5N6 virus was not detected in wild birds after March, but in late summer infected wild birds were found again. In this study, the complete genome sequences of poultry and wild bird viruses were determined to study their genetic relationship. Genetic analysis showed that the outbreaks in poultry were not the result of farm-to-farm transmissions, but rather resulted from separate introductions from wild birds. Wild birds infected with viruses related to the first outbreak in poultry were found at short distances from the farm, within a short time frame. However, no wild bird viruses related to outbreaks 2 and 3 were detected. The H5N6 virus isolated in summer shares a common ancestor with the virus detected in outbreak 1. This suggests long-term circulation of H5N6 virus in the local wild bird population. In addition, the pathogenicity of H5N6 virus in ducks was determined, and compared to that of H5N8 viruses detected in 2014 and 2016. A similar high pathogenicity was measured for H5N6 and H5N8 group B viruses, suggesting that biological or ecological factors in the wild bird population may have affected the mortality rates during the H5N6 epidemic. These observations suggest different infection dynamics for the H5N6 and H5N8 group B viruses in the wild bird population.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBirdsDisease OutbreaksEpidemicsInfluenza A virusInfluenza A Virus, H5N8 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsNetherlandsPoultryPoultry DiseasesWhole Genome SequencingAvian influenzafull genome sequencinggenetic analysisH5N6

Identifiers

PMID30874364
PMCPMC6849594
OpenAlexW2921212181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.