Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30873926›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2020

Extremism and common mental illness: cross-sectional community survey of White British and Pakistani men and women living in England.

Kamaldeep Bhui, Michaela Otis, Maria Joao Silva, Kristoffer Halvorsrud, Mark Freestone, Edgar Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kamaldeep BhuiProfessor of Cultural Psychiatry and Epidemiology, Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London; and Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist, East London NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Head of Centre for Psychiatry and Director of Collaborating Centre, World Psychiatric Association.ORCID 0000-0002-9205-2144
Michaela OtisStatistician, Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Maria Joao SilvaStatistician, Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Kristoffer HalvorsrudResearch Fellow, Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Mark FreestoneSenior Lecturer, Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Edgar JonesProfessor in History of Medicine and Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental illnesses may explain vulnerability to develop extremist beliefs that can lead to violent protest and terrorism. Yet there is little evidence.

aimsTo investigate the relationship between mental illnesses and extremist beliefs.

methodPopulation survey of 618 White British and Pakistani people in England. Extremism was assessed by an established measure of sympathies for violent protest and terrorism (SVPT). Respondents with any positive scores (showing sympathies) were compared with those with all negative scores. We calculated associations between extremist sympathies and ICD-10 diagnoses of depression and dysthymia, and symptoms of anxiety, personality difficulties, autism and post-traumatic stress. Also considered were demographics, life events, social assets, political engagement and criminal convictions.

resultsSVPT were more common in those with major depression with dysthymia (risk ratio 4.07, 95% CI 1.37-12.05, P = 0.01), symptoms of anxiety (risk ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.15, P = 0.002) or post-traumatic stress (risk ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, P = 0.003). At greater risk of SVPT were: young adults (<21 versus ≥21: risk ratio 3.05, 95% CI 1.31-7.06, P = 0.01), White British people (versus Pakistani people: risk ratio 2.24, 95% CI 1.25-4.02, P = 0.007) and those with criminal convictions (risk ratio 2.23, 95% CI 1.01-4.95, P = 0.048). No associations were found with life events, social assets and political engagement.

conclusionDepression, dysthymia and symptoms of anxiety and post-traumatic stress are associated with extremist sympathies.

Indexed as

PoliticsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionDysthymic DisorderEnglandEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPakistanDepressiondysthymiaextremism and radicalisationsociocultural

Identifiers

PMID30873926
PMCPMC7525107
OpenAlexW2911008590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.