ReviewAnnals of global health2019
Evaluation of Indian Prediction Models for Lung Function Parameters: A Statistical Approach.
Review in Annals of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterpretation of lung function test parameters is usually based on comparisons of data with reference (predicted) values based on healthy subjects. Predicted values are obtained from studies of "normal" or "healthy" subjects with similar anthropometric and ethnic characteristics. Regression models are generally used to obtain the reference values from measurements observed in a representative sample of healthy subjects.
objectivesThe study aims to carry out a statistical evaluation of the Indian prediction models of lung function parameters and critically evaluate the reference values for the same in an Indian context.
methodsThe screening and inclusion of the articles for the study was done using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Evaluation of the prediction models has been done with respect to modeling approach, regression diagnostics and methodology protocol. The suitability of the models has also been evaluated using a checklist comprising of 8 criteria developed using the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines.
resultsUsing the PRISMA guidelines 32 articles with a total sample size of 25,289 subjects were included in the final synthesis. Multiple linear regression models were used in 27 articles, with one additionally using weighted least squares technique and 4 using step-wise regression method. Regression diagnostics as per the ATS guidelines were performed and reported by 22 articles. The prediction models were traditionally developed using ordinary least squares method (OLS) without examining the homoskedasticity of residuals. The quality assessment using the checklist developed revealed that only 5 articles satisfied more than 7 out of 8 criteria, and a further 8 articles satisfied less than 3 criteria of suitability of prediction models.
conclusionsIndian prediction models for lung function models are traditionally based on linear regression models, however with more advancement in computational power for sophisticated statistical techniques, more robust prediction models are required in the Indian context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.