Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30873707›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2019

Impact of delisting high-strength opioid formulations from a public drug benefit formulary on opioid utilization in Ontario, Canada.

Diana Martins, Wayne Khuu, Mina Tadrous, David N Juurlink, Muhammad M Mamdani, J Michael Paterson, Tara Gomes, Ontario Drug Policy Research Network

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trends in prescription opioid use for pain in Canada: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study of 6 provinces.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ICES: Data, Discovery, Better Health.International journal of population data science · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Diana MartinsLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8330-7996
Wayne KhuuICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mina TadrousLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David N JuurlinkICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Muhammad M MamdaniLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Michael PatersonICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara GomesLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-1965
Ontario Drug Policy Research Network
St. Michael's Hospital · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHRCIHR 153070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigh-strength opioid formulations were delisted (removed) from Ontario's public drug formulary in January 2017, except for palliative patients. We evaluated the impact of this policy on opioid utilization and dosing.

methodsWe conducted a longitudinal study among patients receiving publicly funded, high-strength opioids from August 2016 to July 2017. The primary outcome measure was weekly median daily opioid dose (in milligrams of morphine or equivalent; MME) of (1) publicly funded and (2) all opioid prescriptions irrespective of funding source, evaluated using interrupted time series analyses and stratified by palliative care status.

resultsFollowing policy implementation, the weekly median daily dose of publicly funded opioids decreased immediately among non-palliative patients by 10 MME (95% confidence limit [CL], -16.8 to -3.1) from a pre-intervention dose of 424.5 MME (95% CL, 417.8-431.2) and fell gradually among palliative patients by 3.9 MME per week (95% CL, -5.5 to -2.3) from a pre-intervention dose of 450.1 MME (95% CL, 432.5-467.7). In contrast, among all opioid prescriptions, gradual reductions in weekly median daily doses were observed only for non-palliative patients, which decreased by 0.7 MME per week (95% CL, -1.3 to -0.2) from a pre-intervention dose of 426.2 MME (95% CL, 420.9-431.5).

conclusionThe delisting of publicly-funded, high-strength opioids was accompanied by changes in funding source and small reductions in the weekly median daily doses dispensed. Although observed dose reductions of less than 1 MME weekly are likely not clinically relevant, safety implications of these changes require further monitoring.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationHumansLongitudinal StudiesOntarioPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug Monitoring ProgramsSubstance-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioiddelistingdoseevaluationOntarioopioidspharmacoepidemiologypolicy change

Identifiers

PMID30873707
PMCPMC6518867
OpenAlexW2921630376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.