Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30873547›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2019

Generalized additive mixed model on the analysis of total transport losses of market-weight pigs1.

Tiago L Passafaro, Denise Van de Stroet, Nora M Bello, Noel H Williams, Guilherme J M Rosa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Welfare of pigs during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tiago L PassafaroDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Denise Van de StroetPIC, Pig Improvement Company, Des Moines, IA.
Nora M BelloDepartment of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Noel H WilliamsIowa Select Farms, Iowa Falls, IA.
Guilherme J M RosaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USKansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transportation losses of market-weight pigs are an animal welfare concern, and result in direct economic impact for producers and abattoirs. Such losses are related to multiple factors including pig genetics, human handling, management, and weather conditions. Understanding the factors associated with total transport losses (TTL) is important to the swine industry because it can aid decision-making, and help in the development of transportation strategies to minimize the risk of losses. Hence, the objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with TTL on market-weight pigs in typically field conditions for Midwestern United States using a generalized additive mixed model (GAMM). The final quasi-binomial GAMM included the fixed (main and interactions) effects of abattoir of destination, type of driver, average market weight, distance traveled, wind speed, precipitation, and temperature-humidity index (THI), as well as the random effects of truck companies and the combination of site of origin and period of the year. Results indicate significant associations between TTL and the main effect of all explanatory variables (P < 0.05), except for wind speed and precipitation. Interactions of average market weight × abattoir, and wind speed × precipitation were also significant. A complex nonlinear relationship between TTL and model covariates were observed for distance traveled, THI, and interaction terms. This study showed that TTL of market-weight pigs are caused by a complex system involving multiple interacting factors, which can be potentially managed to mitigate the risk of losses. In addition, the GAMM showed to be a simple and flexible approach to model TTL because it can capture nonlinear relationships, handle non-normal data, and can potentially accommodate data structure.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareModels, StatisticalAbattoirsAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBody WeightHumidityMidwestern United StatesMotor VehiclesSwineTemperatureTime FactorsTransportationWeathergeneralized additive mixed modelmarket-weight pigstotal transport losses

Identifiers

PMID30873547
PMCPMC6488317
OpenAlexW2921245879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.