ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
onlineFDR: an R package to control the false discovery rate for growing data repositories.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiome Modulation and Health Benefits of a Novel Fucoidan Extract fromMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- From colon wall to tumor niche: Unraveling the microbiome's role in colorectal cancer progression.PloS one · 2024Article
- Online multiple hypothesis testing.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2023Article
- Online error rate control for platform trials.Statistics in medicine · 2023Article
- Global FDR control across multiple RNAseq experiments.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Online control of the False Discovery Rate in group-sequential platform trials.Statistical methods in medical research · 2022Article
- Association mapping of autumn-seeded rye (Secale cereale L.) reveals genetic linkages between genes controlling winter hardiness and plant development.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Accommodating Serial Correlation and Sequential Design Elements in Personalized Studies and Aggregated Personalized Studies.Harvard data science review · 2022Article
- Integrative brain transcriptome analysis links complement component 4 and HSPA2 to the APOE ε2 protective effect in Alzheimer disease.Molecular psychiatry · 2021Article
- Incremental data integration for tracking genotype-disease associations.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Development and Validation of an RNA-Seq-Based Prognostic Signature in Neuroblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryIn many areas of biological research, hypotheses are tested in a sequential manner, without having access to future P-values or even the number of hypotheses to be tested. A key setting where this online hypothesis testing occurs is in the context of publicly available data repositories, where the family of hypotheses to be tested is continually growing as new data is accumulated over time. Recently, Javanmard and Montanari proposed the first procedures that control the FDR for online hypothesis testing. We present an R package, onlineFDR, which implements these procedures and provides wrapper functions to apply them to a historic dataset or a growing data repository. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package is freely available through Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/onlineFDR). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.