Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30873454›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational research2015

How the vagus nerve produces beat-to-beat heart rate variability; experiments in rabbits to mimic in vivo vagal patterns.

John M Karemaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Guidelines for rigor and reproducibility of heart rate variability within human cardiovascular research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. The brain and heart-axis in neurodegeneration and cardiovascular disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cardiac vagal activity and daily clinical practice.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John M KaremakerDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology and Physiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimAnalysis of heart rate variability (HRV) has recently become the playing field of mathematicians and physicists, losing its relation to physiology and the clinic. To set the record straight, a set of animal experiments is presented here, which was designed to test how vagus nerve traffic might produce beat to beat (b-t-b) heart rate (HR) control, like the baroreflex will do in vivo.

methodsThe response of HR to vagus nerve stimulation was tested after bilateral vagotomy in rabbits under anesthesia. Three protocols were followed: 1. Single burst stimulation at varying moments in one cardiac cycle; 2. B-t-b stimulation in each cycle, coupled to the P-wave with variable delays; in addition, testing the effects of one increased or decreased burst; 3. Tetanic stimulation, shortly interrupted or increased at varying moments in the cardiac cycle. RESULTS AND

conclusionsSensitivity of the sinoatrial node to the timing of vagal bursts in its cycle from protocol 1 explains most of the observations. A single burst would be most effective when applied in late repolarization or early diastole of the sinoatrial node's action potential. In b-t-b stimulation the longest cardiac cycles occur when bursts are timed just before the end of the 'sensitive period'. Later coming bursts have their (diminished) effect on the next cycle; critically timed bursts induce an unstable HR, alternating between long and short cycles. This ran in synchrony with the respirator, thus producing a large respiratory sinus arrhythmia, even though the vagus nerves had been cut. HR-response to vagal burst activity shows two components: a fast one which is phase-sensitive and a slow one that builds up with longer lasting activity and also disappears slowly. Tetanic stimulation results in prolonged, but variable cycle lengths which are difficult to change by short-lasting manipulation of impulse frequency, be it up or down. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: Measurement of heart rate variability (HRV) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) have become clinical tools in the cardiology clinic and in hypertension research. This study shows how the underlying vagus nerve to heart rate physiology is responsible for moment-to-moment variability in these numbers at almost unchanged underlying physiology. Programmed stimulation of the vagus nerves in acute animals (rabbits) demonstrates that the optimal mode of fast, beat-to-beat heart rate control by these nerves is by means of bursts of impulses arriving in every heart beat at well-timed moments. In vivo this is how the baroreflex stabilizes blood pressure at the expense of HRV.

Indexed as

baroreflexcardiac autonomic plexuscardiac baroreflexphase response curverespiratory sinus arrhythmiasinoatrial nodevagotomy

Identifiers

PMID30873454
PMCPMC6410617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.